I just rented a movie and I believe it was in aspect ratio 2:35:1. I was just wondering if the HD movies are all that way or some in 16:9.. I don't know much about this stuff so any help would be great
AMEN BROTHER!I'm just thankful those 2.35:1 movies don't get cropped to fit 16:9 like on many broadcast channels to avoid the complaints from the ill-informed.
Living in the southern US, I've heard my share of "Ah bought this-here fancy Tee-Vee to get rid of those dang black bars, by God, so whah do ah still see 'em?"
People like this don't deserve advances in technology. These people are the reason I have to watch TBS-HD and the like in "stretch-o-vision." When will the cable networks wake up? If I want to remove those black bars and watch a stretched picture, let me do it myself, but don't force it down my throat!
The HD movie frame aspect ratio is dependent upon the source format.
For the record, every single reference to 2.35:1 is incorrect. This aspect ratio was used in the 1950's with CinemaScope, a now defunct format. There isn't a single film shot in CinemaScope these days.
So here's how it works....
1.37:1 - 35mm full aperture.
1.33:1 (4:3) - Standard definition television
1.66:1 - not contemporary, used in some Kubrick films e.g. Barry Lyndon, Full Metal Jacket
1.78:1 (16:9) - HDTV frame aspect ratio
1.85:1 - Super 35mm, soft- or hard-matted from 1.37:1.
2.40:1 - Panavision. Mistakenly called "Scope" and 2.35:1. Filmed on 1.37:1 frame using an anamorphic lens.
Every one of these aspect ratios other than 16: will have matte lines when viewed on an HDTV.
1.37:1 - 35mm full aperture.
1.33:1 (4:3) - Standard definition television
1.66:1 - not contemporary, used in some Kubrick films e.g. Barry Lyndon, Full Metal Jacket
1.78:1 (16:9) - HDTV frame aspect ratio
1.85:1 - Super 35mm, soft- or hard-matted from 1.37:1.
2.40:1 - Panavision. Mistakenly called "Scope" and 2.35:1. Filmed on 1.37:1 frame using an anamorphic lens.