Abstract said:
The rules have even been changed during assignments to accomodate a few very good suggestions. However, if the assignments are going to be less restrictive, then we may as well call them what they really are --- "normal threads" --- threads that we are free to start up any day of the week without restrictions, because that's what any regular thread is like anyway. Of course we can have normal threads where any photos from any time can be posted, but I don't think that's what an assignment should be about -- going out and shooting.
This is where you and I agree to disagree upon.
I think it is possible to do both. At the start of a monthly assignment (IMO this would be a month before the official "start"; meaning that the theme might be announced lets say on May 1, but the requested shooting not start till June 1) would be more of an open season for those of us with prior images to post them. This would help feed those wondering how to approach the assignment, some ideas. But at least for me it would not limit late comers in contributing prior images.
There is fun in trying to look for images that fit the assignment. But in some ways for many on MR the assignments are too narrow. Just witness the depth of the Sunrise/Sunset and Landmark threads.
In the end looking at the Sunrise/Sunset thread, there have at least of a couple ideas as I mentioned that could in the end expand on that theme of that thread. And if it were an assignment thread, might even give us many more great images to inspire us. Is that not the reason for the assignments?
Looking at the most recent assignment, there is not the same feeling of desire to do better, or look at things in a new way. In my post above about Practical Photography, I used to look at the offerings with the eye of would I want to buy that image. In the Sunrise/Sunset thread there have been quite a few that I might want to buy for my wall. But in the assignment threads, there has been few to meet that mark.
I know that in these two threads I mentioned, I have posted images. I have gotten some positive feedback. And that I say thank you. But I also would like to have gotten some other comments on as to how it may have missed the mark.
And if enough people want to be able to post as many photos in a month as possible, or make it more exciting by having a vote for the best photo that fits the monthly theme, then so be it. Maybe we can add this into the mix if people want a bit of competitiveness as well. If that's what people want, then lets try it out.
Just remember that it's
April 29th right now (where I live, anyway), and next month is coming very soon.
The point there is that we should have been told almost 30 days ago IMO as to what we are to shoot beginning May 1. To give some thought as to how we might approach it. And to see some ideas as to how we can see the theme.
Competitiveness is all well and good. I know that I love a good contest.
Been lucky that I have won a few in my years.
And I have had the pleasure in sitting as a judge in some competitions.
Maybe that is the problem as I see it. It is a competition without a "real" prize. Rules are there for when something is at stake, not personal pride.
There are sites like photosig.com that you can post images to their monthly assignments in order to get VERY honest critiques. The MR DPF should be more fun than that. Honestly as member there, some of my images did well and others not so well. Only a small handful of the current assignment thread would do well. But there are many more from the likes of the Sunrise/Sunset thread that IMO would have done very well in.
They have no prizes for the best image. Just VERY honest opinions. Your competitive nature can be measured by the overall ranking of what you post.
And if you are involved for the competition of the assignment, one would hope that in the Insanity thread you might have had no more than two images by my count. If I am wrong sorry.
And in that same thread I saw none from Applespider by my count - sorry Applespider if I got that wrong. If we are to have leaders in a thread, should there not be visual participation - unless I missed the rules that thread leaders could not post images. Why limit those that want to share their multiple takes, other than for a personal bias?
At least i posted some prior images that I thought supported my position.
As I said, i do thank you both for trying to keep the idea alive. I do like it from a general POV. But the way it has gone it does not (despite the poll results) related to some great images or discussion of those images.
Maybe in the next round we can see prior and recent images in order to have a meaningful "competition". Just give us more time is the biggest request I have.