Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

belvdr

macrumors 603
Original poster
Aug 15, 2005
5,945
1,372
Picked this up on Slashdot, but here's the relevant article.

Honestly, this guy confuses me by some of the terminology but the security issues do not. If AT&T, T-Mobile, and Cingular are doing this, and I suspect they are, they are in a world of hurt. This isn't just about the iPad incident, but about an insecure architectural design, which could increase their network load, should they decide to fix it.
 

FX120

macrumors 65816
May 18, 2007
1,173
235
I am still cracking up every time I hear "****** Security" mentioned on the nightly news...

And I really laughed at this comment on SD: "This whole ordeal has turned out to be a real pain in the arse..."
 

kdarling

macrumors P6
What that article mainly says is that ATT and T-Mobile to more or less directly correlate the public ICCID and the supposedly secret IMSI. And that the IMSI can be used to query a ton of information.

So even without the leak of email addresses, a hacker could make up random or targeted IMSIs and get all the info he wanted anyway, from the user's real name to phone number.
 

benthewraith

macrumors 68040
May 27, 2006
3,140
143
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Picked this up on Slashdot, but here's the relevant article.

Honestly, this guy confuses me by some of the terminology but the security issues do not. If AT&T, T-Mobile, and Cingular are doing this, and I suspect they are, they are in a world of hurt. This isn't just about the iPad incident, but about an insecure architectural design, which could increase their network load, should they decide to fix it.

AT&T has 114,000 SIM cards to replace? It sounds like this vulnerability extends to the iPhone as well, or just about any SIM phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.