I must commend AT&T on the events of the last 2 days.
So I'm curious, as someone who's
not an AT&T customer... AT&T rolled out a 3G network and smartphones and other phones over the past several years, with various capabilities like streaming video and audio, real web browsing, uploading videos, MMS, etc, etc, correct? I mean, most of those features were deployed on one device or another before the iPhone, yes?
So, now, they make a video saying how proud they are to have lead the "smartphone revolution" or whatever they called it, how much bandwidth these services use and how complicated it is to roll our a server upgrade and how they have to do this and that manually here and there, etc, etc.
Do you not find this duplicitous? Why would they not have expected these devices to use a lot of bandwidth when they agreed to sell them and have them used on their network? It would seem to me that the surprise is how little smartphones were used, datawise, before the iPhone.
And yet they act shocked, like they can't believe this happened to them.
I understand the argument that a small subset of iPhone users have
exceptional bandwidth demands -- wanting to play slingbox over 3G, tether, etc. This is much like the situation in bandwidth capping on home broadband -- there
is a small percentage of those users as well who consume 20 or 30 GB a month of broadband data, or whatever.
But here, we aren't talking about that, are we? AT&T still hasn't announced a tethering plan for the iPhone, have they? They're talking about MMS and basic 3G access
with all the blocked features like Slingplayer.
I guess what I'm saying is that, were I an AT&T user, I would be insulted by this.
P.S. His eyebrows creep me out.
