Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

da3dl3us

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 27, 2010
69
0
So I charged my battery to 100% as per the battery calibration tools. It says amount of time left on my battery is 3hours and 30 mins. I haven't done anything to the system in terms of brightness, etc.

Is this just because it hasn't been calibrated yet or is the battery life of the i7 really that poor?
 

da3dl3us

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 27, 2010
69
0
My MBA 13 i5 says 8h 40. Not expecting to get that

Damn, this is not good. I hope the battery life isn't crappy on this cpu. I'm gonna give it a shot with a proper calibration and see what happens.
 

KPOM

macrumors P6
Oct 23, 2010
18,311
8,326
The indicator can be notoriously unpredictable, especially at first. Once it has a chance to calibrate itself it should get better over time. By all means force a calibration if you want, but it's better to gauge battery life with a clock than by the display.
 

Mikael

macrumors regular
Aug 4, 2005
158
0
Gothenburg, Sweden
Damn, this is not good. I hope the battery life isn't crappy on this cpu.
Of course it's not. The CPUs are physically the same. The only difference is that Intel has kept all cache enabled on the i7 and bumped the clock frequency by 100MHz. The effect on full load will be very small to negligible and the effect in idle should basically be nil.
 

da3dl3us

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 27, 2010
69
0
Of course it's not. The CPUs are physically the same. The only difference is that Intel has kept all cache enabled on the i7 and bumped the clock frequency by 100MHz. The effect on full load will be very small to negligible and the effect in idle should basically be nil.

Ah, you're probably right, just got a bit nervous. I'm just going to let it calibrate itself and see how it is.
 

Scuba629

macrumors regular
Jul 14, 2010
249
5
Ah, you're probably right, just got a bit nervous. I'm just going to let it calibrate itself and see how it is.


Just make sure the CPU isnt working hard. I'm interested to know the reported numbers also.. You sure got yours fast. I wish my was here.
 

da3dl3us

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 27, 2010
69
0
Just make sure the CPU isnt working hard. I'm interested to know the reported numbers also.. You sure got yours fast. I wish my was here.

Picked it up in store. They had the ultimate 13'' in stock.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,556
950
So I charged my battery to 100% as per the battery calibration tools. It says amount of time left on my battery is 3hours and 30 mins.
The time indicated is an ever-changing estimate, based on the current power demands of your system, which is affected by a great number of factors, including screen brightness, WiFi, Bluetooth, apps/processes/widgets running, etc. This should answer most, if not all, of your battery questions:
 

calvol

macrumors 6502a
Feb 3, 2011
995
4
If you can, put the machine in idle, close all apps/windows, and wait about 15 seconds for the battery life indicator to update. This should give you the upper end of the range.

The battery indicator will sometimes show battery life to be much lower than actually remaining, based on the instantaneous consumption of TurboBoost at that moment.
 

jackyyeow

macrumors 6502
Jul 5, 2011
262
0
The best way to test battery life is to record your current time and battery %. Use your laptop as how you normally use, for 30mins, then check your % again. You can get way more realistic battery life indication that way, though still not definite but enough to give you confident result.
 

fyrefly

macrumors 6502a
Jun 27, 2004
624
67
Of course it's not. The CPUs are physically the same. The only difference is that Intel has kept all cache enabled on the i7 and bumped the clock frequency by 100MHz. The effect on full load will be very small to negligible and the effect in idle should basically be nil.

I dunno - there were numerous reports of the battery life being worse in the 2.13Ghz C2D model than the 1.86Ghz C2D model. Despite those chips being physically the same. I even noticed that I'd get barely 5Hrs of use on the 2.13 and when I switched it for the 1.86 I'd get a good 7-8.

I'm not saying the same will be the case here with the i5/i7 models, but it's certainly not unprecedented.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.