Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

spell87

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 16, 2014
1
0
Boston
After many preliminary performance tests done on previous iMacs, macbooks with the latest Yosemite dev preview versions, I've concluded that if you own a mac computer older than two years old, don't upgrade immediately. Older apple computers takes a huge performance hit going from Mavericks to Yosemite. Wait and see if apple responds.
 

CyBeRino

macrumors 6502a
Jun 18, 2011
744
46
I'm running 10.10 on a late 2011 macbook pro and I disagree with that statement.

Though I should add I've tricked out that laptop with an ssd. But everyone should do that regardless of OS.
 

jsolares

macrumors 6502a
Aug 8, 2011
844
3
Land of eternal Spring
I'm running 10.10 on a late 2011 macbook pro and I disagree with that statement.

Though I should add I've tricked out that laptop with an ssd. But everyone should do that regardless of OS.

I have a 2010 27" iMac with SSDs and i agree with his statement, it feels slower, no idea if it's actually slower though heh.
 

davelanger

macrumors 6502a
Mar 25, 2009
832
2
After many preliminary performance tests done on previous iMacs, macbooks with the latest Yosemite dev preview versions, I've concluded that if you own a mac computer older than two years old, don't upgrade immediately. Older apple computers takes a huge performance hit going from Mavericks to Yosemite. Wait and see if apple responds.

I have a mid 2010 mac pro and yosemite is way faster than mavericks. But that is probably because I have 8 GB of RAM and a Radeon HD 5870 graphics card from when i used to play WoW
 
Last edited:

Traverse

macrumors 604
Mar 11, 2013
7,710
4,489
Here
All kinds of maintenance and indexing processes occurs after a major update. Give it a day and then restart and you should see a difference.
 

simon48

macrumors 65816
Sep 1, 2010
1,315
88
If this was true longterm wouldn't there be threads about this from the months of beta testing? I haven't seen any threads, so I bet it's maintenance tasks like others have said.
 

Graig

macrumors 6502
Aug 23, 2009
329
5
Vancouver, BC
I tried one of the beta versions, 2 I think, on my 2008 iMac and saw no noticible performance hit. I did run into a problem with Mail and one where Safari Share button says No Services and that is why I'm back on Mavericks and waiting for a while whilst reading all the others complaints for a change.
 

TitanTiger

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2009
422
84
When I was running the public betas Yosemite always felt quicker on my 2009 iMac. But I also have the RAM maxed out at 16GB.
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,380
3,415
Yosemite doesn't run noticeably slower on my 2008 Aluminium MacBook. It takes a wee bit to longer to launch, but overall I don't have any performance issues.
 

poiihy

macrumors 68020
Aug 22, 2014
2,301
62
I have been using Yosemite since first beta. I had no performace issues with it. it is no different than Mavericks. Mine is Mid-2009 MBP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.