S sejanus macrumors regular Original poster May 3, 2005 105 0 Jul 29, 2010 #1 Hi Guys Price is not an issue. I already have a macpro but want an Imac for wedding reception slideshows of my photography - I want the extra grunt over a laptop. Anyone know if the quad 2.93 would be better than the dual 3.6ghz?
Hi Guys Price is not an issue. I already have a macpro but want an Imac for wedding reception slideshows of my photography - I want the extra grunt over a laptop. Anyone know if the quad 2.93 would be better than the dual 3.6ghz?
iBookG4user macrumors 604 Jun 27, 2006 6,595 2 Seattle, WA Jul 29, 2010 #2 The quad would be faster, so if you want raw power, go for that.
J JHorstmann macrumors member Jul 26, 2010 47 0 Jul 29, 2010 #3 Quad would be faster for sure- but for doing photo slideshows I'd say just make sure you've got plenty of RAM- The CPU should be fast enough.
Quad would be faster for sure- but for doing photo slideshows I'd say just make sure you've got plenty of RAM- The CPU should be fast enough.
Cave Man macrumors 604 Feb 12, 2007 7,171 356 Neander Valley, Germany; just outside Duesseldorf Jul 29, 2010 #4 You'd want the i7 iMac for maximum efficiency. Aperture uses the gpu (lots of vRAM) and does hyperthreading.
You'd want the i7 iMac for maximum efficiency. Aperture uses the gpu (lots of vRAM) and does hyperthreading.