Looks pretty cool, but the dealbreaker for me is that the 30-pin connector is unavailable for use when using this watchband.
So using the Nike+ sportskit becomes impossible.
I've thought about putting together a prototype watchband that would provide bluetooth through the headphone port, thus leaving the 30-pin for the Nike+ receiver.
But I figured that the next Nano would solve the problem for me by baking in BT or Nike+ (or both) right out of the box.
For now, I continue to use my iWatchz band with wired headphones.
ft
With all due respect, you're wrong. The nano 6G does not have the Nike+ receiver built-in. Even with the latest firmware. What the latest firmware does do, is allow for the built-in accelerometer to calculate running data.The Nike+ dongle dosent work in the new Nano after the last software update. It was because Apple built that all into the OS so it's a non issue. I used to work for a company that sold iPods and we had a seves area for computer and whatnot divece repair and I can't tell you how many people were like I did the software update and now this doesn't work what's up and we had to explain the situation.
With all due respect, you're wrong. The nano 6G does not have the Nike+ receiver built-in. Even with the latest firmware. What the latest firmware does do, is allow for the built-in accelerometer to calculate running data.
Without the Nike+ kit, you still cannot use the footpod (potentially more accurate) and you can't use any of the Nike+ accessories (which include the HR strap and the discontinued Nike+ remote).
Track your walk. Or your run.
The built-in accelerometer in iPod nano gives you real-time feedback on your workout, and you can upload data to the Nike+ website. Theres no need to connect a receiver or use a shoe sensor to track your steps, distance, pace and time. Just clip on iPod nano and go. In the gym, connect iPod nano to a Nike + iPod compatible cardio machine to keep track of every workout. Back at your computer, upload all your data to the Nike+ website to create personal goals, check your progress and challenge your friends to top your results.
After reading this I was still right except for one thing you do need it to use the Polar WearLink+ Heart Rate Transmitter for Nike+, along with supported Nike+ remotes. The Nano does have the Nike+ built in to the os like I said.
https://nikerunning.custhelp.com/ap...0490/~/ipod-nano-(6th-generation)-fitness-app
No, you were wrong. You said the Nike+ dongle doesn't work with the new firmware. It absolutely does work.
Anyways, there are a myriad of other reasons to use the dongle for Nike+, especially when using with a watchband (as is the point of this thread). For example, if you want to run using Nike+ and a watchband, you have two choices ... with the Nike+ receiver and without the receiver.
If you run without the receiver using the watchband, the software will have to account for your armswinging motion to count your pace. In my estimation, this will be wildly inaccurate, even if you calibrate it. Your arm swing will vary a lot more than your footsteps, especially as you tire over the duration of your run.
With the footpod, you can swing your arms like a wildman if you want and your pace will be recorded more accurately.
can you use the nano only with the footpod and not the receiver attached to the nano?
I really think that with the trend of these new watches etc, the new ipod nano will feature all the features that will make it the perfect watch. Pairing with iphone, bluetooth etc..
That's an interesting idea. Perhaps Apple will do to the iPod nano what it did to the apple TV. Get rid of local storage and grab everything elsewhere, in this case, bluetooth to the iPhone/ipod/ipad/imac/iproduct....
Well idk about getting rid of storage as a lot of people would still use it for a music device.
Add bluetooth and a decent set of bluetooth headphones it would be nice.
Also, connectivity with an iphone with alerts would be ideal.