Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rfruth

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 5, 2007
195
0
Texas
I don't do anything fancy but need/want to use Win Vista (home pro) on new Mac Mini (Leopard, 2 GB RAM) 95 % OS X 5 % XP - have to reboot with boot camp but it's included with X - parallels $ 79.95 but more convenient - any opinions :rolleyes:
 

72930

Retired
May 16, 2006
9,060
4
Are you sure you're not running Tiger?

Parallels is better with that much RAM, but there is no support for the see-through glass, yet
 

TBi

macrumors 68030
Jul 26, 2005
2,583
6
Ireland
Well you can't boot your vista bootcamp with parallels yet so you'll need a new license. Anyway though... download the trial...
 

zwida

macrumors 6502a
Jan 5, 2001
596
26
NYC + Madison, WI
I use Parallels at home and BootCamp at work. Unless you'll be in Windows all the time, just reboot into Windows using BootCamp. It works just fine now and I imagine the Leopard version will fix the few flaws that currently exist.

Parallels is also fine, but in my case (using Windows very occasionally), it's just not necessary.
 

0007776

Suspended
Jul 11, 2006
6,473
8,170
Somewhere
It depends what you want to do with it, if you want to play games you will want to use bootcamp. download the trial of paralells, and see if you think that it is worth buying for you.

And are you sure that you are running Leopard?;)
 

3nm

macrumors 6502a
Jul 30, 2006
991
0
i like how //s runs under tiger, no need to reboot and coherence is great. but ymmv on leopard. :rolleyes:

I don't do anything fancy but need/want to use Win Vista (home pro) on new Mac Mini (Leopard, 2 GB RAM) 95 % OS X 5 % XP - have to reboot with boot camp but it's included with X - parallels $ 79.95 but more convenient - any opinions :rolleyes:
 

chicagdan

macrumors 6502a
Jan 3, 2002
723
0
Chicago, IL
I don't do anything fancy but need/want to use Win Vista (home pro) on new Mac Mini (Leopard, 2 GB RAM) 95 % OS X 5 % XP - have to reboot with boot camp but it's included with X - parallels $ 79.95 but more convenient - any opinions :rolleyes:

Why doesn't VMWare Fusion get any love? Jeez, it's a free download (at least while in beta) ... it has DirectX ... it's built for dual processors. Parallels keeps adding bells and whistles, but VMWare seems to make the most important technological leaps first.
 

rfruth

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 5, 2007
195
0
Texas
Wait en for the *new* Mini with Leopard on it - no gaming and only light use of Windows so sounds like Bootcamp will do me just fine but not sure what I'll end up doing :eek:
 

pubb

macrumors regular
Mar 13, 2007
154
158
If you plan to do any sort of work that requires anything more than modest demands of your graphics subsystem, use BootCamp. Parallels cannot take advantage of hardware acceleration, whereas BootCamp can.

If you're going the BootCamp route, I would hold off until Leopard. For now, BootCamp is technically beta which means Apple has zero liability/support/responsibility for it.

When Leopard comes out, they may very well disable the beta versions floating around out there and tell you to wipe the XP partition and start over from scratch - with a newly purchased 10.5 retail box.

Pubb
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.