Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zershin

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 10, 2009
2
0
Hey guys first post here, I bought a new 15" MacBook pro last week. I want to know when you are running windows how do you tell that you a using the 512MDVramm video card? And I also want to know why windows is showing I have 2.76gb of ramm, when the machine has 4gbs.

Thanks for you help.
 

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
36
XP can only use about 3gb of ram.

Windows, you probably have to right click on desktop and go to graphics properties or nvidia.
 

LtRammstein

macrumors 6502a
Jun 20, 2006
570
0
Denver, CO
Depends on what kind of operating system you use.

If it's a 32-bit OS, then 3GB is the physical max (technically you can go higher), but if it's a 64-bit, you can use all 4 GB and more.
 

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
36
Depends on what kind of operating system you use.

If it's a 32-bit OS, then 3GB is the physical max (technically you can go higher), but if it's a 64-bit, you can use all 4 GB and more.

That's true for windows only.

OSX can do more than 3gb of ram even with 32bit OS.
 

Stridder44

macrumors 68040
Mar 24, 2003
3,973
198
California
That's true for windows only.

OSX can do more than 3gb of ram even with 32bit OS.

OK, up to 4 (at best). It's still a 32-bit OS.

To the OP: You need to get a 64-bit OS. Vista and (soon to be released) Windows 7 both have 64-bit varients that are very fast/stable.
 

steveza

macrumors 68000
Feb 20, 2008
1,521
27
UK
OSX is not windows.
True - I don't think anyone has ever got the 2 confused. What's your point? :)

OSX can access more than 4gb of RAM for awhile time now, even with OSX with 32bit architecture.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/08/26/road_to_mac_os_x_10_6_snow_leopard_64_bits.html&page=2
According to that link OS X has been 64bit since Tiger (maybe earlier?) so will have been able to access more than 4GB RAM. This might explain my point better: http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1079.
 

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
36
According to that link OS X has been 64bit since Tiger (maybe earlier?) so will have been able to access more than 4GB RAM. This might explain my point better: http://www.ofzenandcomputing.com/zanswers/1079.

Someone didn't read the article...

Quote:
"Tiger still used a 32-bit kernel (although it was not limited to 32-bit memory addressing"

I mentioned OSX is not windows because the 32bit memory addressing limitation only applies to windows, as OSX has >32 bit memory addressing for a long time now.

Anyway, since it's a limitation of winodws, to get 4gb of RAM in windows you need 64bit windows, and 64bit vista > 64bit xp, as there are very few drivers fro 64bit xp, and in windows drivers (since there are few built in support) is essential to operation.
 

steveza

macrumors 68000
Feb 20, 2008
1,521
27
UK
Someone didn't read the article...

Quote:
"Tiger still used a 32-bit kernel (although it was not limited to 32-bit memory addressing"

I mentioned OSX is not windows because the 32bit memory addressing limitation only applies to windows, as OSX has >32 bit memory addressing for a long time now.
Another quote from the same article: "With updates to Tiger, Apple delivered the same level of 64-bit support for x64 Intel processors as it had for the PowerPC G5."
 

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
36
The point is that even with 32bit OSX, OSX is not limited to 32bit address of RAM.

Yes there are 64bit OSX which you are pointing out but that's not the point.

Windows is limited, even with vista, thus "need" for a particular version.
64bit ram addressing requiring "64bit os" only applies to windows.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.