Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
and please keep your complaints to yourself. Thank you, you have been warned.

Steve Jobs announced that Apple's entire product line will be transitioned to Intel in 2006. This is earlier than previously announced at WWDC 2005. Jobs notes that over the coming months we will hear announcements as each product line is transitioned. All by the end of this calendar year.
 

Lacero

macrumors 604
Jan 20, 2005
6,637
3
Agreed. You have been warned.

attachment.php


This should be made a sticky.
 

Kernow

macrumors 65816
Sep 30, 2005
1,438
0
Kingston-Upon-Thames
rdowns said:
Steve Jobs announced that Apple's entire product line will be transitioned to Intel in 2006. This is earlier than previously announced at WWDC 2005.

Didn't pick this up earlier, but I've not had a chance to watch the keynote stream yet. If the iMacs are supposedly twice as fast, I can't wait to see what the PowerMacs (or whatever they're going to be called now they seem to be getting rid of the 'Power' prefix) are like.

rdowns said:
Stop your damn complaining. Your computer is just as good as when you bought it x weeks ago. Deal with it.

Spot on. :D
 

jadekitty24

macrumors 65816
Oct 19, 2005
1,369
0
The poor section of Connecticut
Thank you both rdowns and lacero, for making the obvious that much more obvious to those whose common sense isn't all there;) If I had been the one to point that out it wouldn't have been so pretty. I can't bring myself to read any of these "I'm so mad I have an out-dated 4 day old iMac POS" posts (or threads) anymore. That's saying a lot because I read EVERYTHING on this site.
Ok, I'm done.
Any Apple is a good Apple, people!!!
 

kretzy

macrumors 604
Sep 11, 2004
7,921
2
Canberra, Australia
Good philosophy there. Now that people know whats going on, no complaints until at least 2007. And that goes for people who bought so close to MWSF too, where there was definitely going to be something announced.
 

Ashapalan

macrumors 6502a
Apr 17, 2005
543
0
England
Kernow said:
Didn't pick this up earlier, but I've not had a chance to watch the keynote stream yet. If the iMacs are supposedly twice as fast, I can't wait to see what the PowerMacs (or whatever they're going to be called now they seem to be getting rid of the 'Power' prefix) are like.



Spot on. :D

yep,
im just about to lay down a payment for a 1gig ram stick for my 12" POWER PC powerbook.

without reservations.
 

rdowns

macrumors Penryn
Original poster
Jul 11, 2003
27,397
12,521
Lacero said:
Agreed. You have been warned.



This should be made a sticky.

I like this version of this pic. The 3 GHz is coming out of his "ars".:eek:
 

ipacmm

macrumors 65816
Jun 17, 2003
1,304
0
Cincinnati, OH
Lacero said:
Agreed. You have been warned.

attachment.php


This should be made a sticky.

Funny pic...but I hope that they don't release new Power Mac's soon, I want to keep using mine for a few more months until the new ones come out and make mine look really slow...
 

jemeinc

macrumors 6502a
Feb 14, 2004
771
0
South Jersey
Apple just replaced my G4 800 MHZ iMac that was 4 days away from its Applecare expiration date w/ a 1.9 GHZ, G5 iSight, iMac for free because of a failed logic board... This is the very 1st problem this iMac has ever given me, and it was replaced after 1 kernal panic in 3 years... lol... Should I try to give my G5 iMac back since the new ones came out 4 days after I picked up my machine...lol...;-)... just kidding...
 

Applespider

macrumors G4
Kernow said:
Didn't pick this up earlier, but I've not had a chance to watch the keynote stream yet. If the iMacs are supposedly twice as fast, I can't wait to see what the PowerMacs are like.

Probably not twice as fast. Bear in mind that the twice as fast G5 is going from a single processor to a dual core processor whereas the PM are already dual/quad processor - and the test they ran, is apparently designed to test multiprocessor capabilities, so the singles would have performed less well than they do in real life.
 

Mr. Anderson

Moderator emeritus
Nov 1, 2001
22,568
7
VA
I bought a Quad yesterday and I can't wait to get it.

One thing needs to be mentioned is that if you can wait, there's nothing wrong with that - but in my case I just couldn't wait any longer and I needed something to replace my aging dual 1.25 G4.

I know that this thread is out here for all the potential whiners, but bear in mind that its still ok to buy a G5 and regardless what you do, someone is not going to be observant, notice this and many other threads and then come in a complain :p

D
 

revisionA

macrumors 6502
May 27, 2005
283
0
Bah, humbug. I love my Revision E Powerbook, the best ever made!

And thats how you should see it. If a bad ass fw800 hard drive comes out... I can still use it!

MacBook Pro, Rev B, maybe you'll get my money... if you get 6+ hours of battery especially.

$
 

JRM PowerPod

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2005
446
0
Outback Australia
ipacmm said:
Funny pic...but I hope that they don't release new Power Mac's soon, I want to keep using mine for a few more months until the new ones come out and make mine look really slow...

Nothing will ever make our Quads slow.... Our systems are the quickest around at the moment, its going to be some feat in the short term to produce a system which makes my 16 second photoshop test result 'radial blur' look slow...My 12" PowerBook with 1.25gb takes 2mins 36secs...... Its slow

Quad PowerMac...... The last PowerPC ever...... The Greatest Ever....... BTW its had all Ram replaced and logic board replaced and it still doesnt work......LOL......But when it works it is mad
 

cubist

macrumors 68020
Jul 4, 2002
2,075
0
Muncie, Indiana
In fact, if they replace the whole product line in 2006, they will not have a machine as fast as the Quad. Intel doesn't make a CPU that would let them build a quad at all, and isn't expected to in 2006.
 

kretzy

macrumors 604
Sep 11, 2004
7,921
2
Canberra, Australia
cubist said:
In fact, if they replace the whole product line in 2006, they will not have a machine as fast as the Quad. Intel doesn't make a CPU that would let them build a quad at all, and isn't expected to in 2006.

Well there must be something, because there is no way they would downgrade from the Quad, or any other computer.
 

Glen Quagmire

macrumors 6502a
Jan 6, 2006
512
0
UK
cubist said:
In fact, if they replace the whole product line in 2006, they will not have a machine as fast as the Quad. Intel doesn't make a CPU that would let them build a quad at all, and isn't expected to in 2006.

Oh, yes it is:

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28862

Woodcrest is the new Xeon. Xeon is designed for dual/multi CPU systems and will be dual core. 2 Xeons * 2 cores per Xeon = 4 cores = Quad. QED.
 

Mr. Anderson

Moderator emeritus
Nov 1, 2001
22,568
7
VA
with a 1.33 Ghz bus, I wonder what the chip speeds will be? And how it will compare to a Quad G5 - but I agree that they won't release something that is slower than an older model.

D
 

QCassidy352

macrumors G5
Mar 20, 2003
12,066
6,107
Bay Area
Mr. Anderson said:
with a 1.33 Ghz bus, I wonder what the chip speeds will be? And how it will compare to a Quad G5 - but I agree that they won't release something that is slower than an older model.

D

well, SJ could always just spin the results of the tests to make it appear faster... I mean, Apple would NEVER do a thing like that! :eek: :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.