OK, so I've been drooling over a new Mac for over two years now and the time has finally come when I'm looking to get one
Unfortunately, the economic realities of being a prospective British university student from next September onwards mean that cost is a big factor and therefore I need to make some sensible decisions in order to make the compromise between price and a machine that is going to last me for as long as possible.
So it's been narrowed down to the iMac as my machine of choice. Having visited the Apple stores at Bluewater and Regent Street, I've seen first hand the difference in size between the 17" and 20" screens and while the 20" is very impressive, I'm not sure that I will necessary need it if it means compromising in other areas.
I've specced a couple of machines out and they are as follows:
* 1GB 533 DDR2 SDRAM - 2x512MB
* 250GB Serial ATA drive
* Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X
* 17-inch TFT display
* 1.9GHz PowerPC G5
* DVD±RW/CD-RW drive double layer
* ATI Radeon X600 Pro - 128MB DDR
* AirPort Extreme
* Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
* £1,019.01
* 1.5GB 533 DDR2 SDRAM - 1x512MB + 1x1GB
* 250GB Serial ATA drive
* Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X
* 20-inch TFT display
* 2.1GHz PowerPC G5
* DVD±RW/CD-RW drive double layer
* ATI Radeon X600 XL - 128MB DDR
* AirPort Extreme
* Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
* £1,339.01
Basically, I'd like your thoughts as to whether or not I could get away with the 17" as the price difference is quite considerable. It is going to be used mainly for word processing, email, multimedia (usage not processing) etc. so it doesn't need to be a beast of a machine! Is the extra .2Ghz paticularly noticable and would the 1GB of RAM suffice with the 17"?
Thanks in advance for your help
Unfortunately, the economic realities of being a prospective British university student from next September onwards mean that cost is a big factor and therefore I need to make some sensible decisions in order to make the compromise between price and a machine that is going to last me for as long as possible.
So it's been narrowed down to the iMac as my machine of choice. Having visited the Apple stores at Bluewater and Regent Street, I've seen first hand the difference in size between the 17" and 20" screens and while the 20" is very impressive, I'm not sure that I will necessary need it if it means compromising in other areas.
I've specced a couple of machines out and they are as follows:
* 1GB 533 DDR2 SDRAM - 2x512MB
* 250GB Serial ATA drive
* Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X
* 17-inch TFT display
* 1.9GHz PowerPC G5
* DVD±RW/CD-RW drive double layer
* ATI Radeon X600 Pro - 128MB DDR
* AirPort Extreme
* Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
* £1,019.01
* 1.5GB 533 DDR2 SDRAM - 1x512MB + 1x1GB
* 250GB Serial ATA drive
* Keyboard & Mighty Mouse + Mac OS X
* 20-inch TFT display
* 2.1GHz PowerPC G5
* DVD±RW/CD-RW drive double layer
* ATI Radeon X600 XL - 128MB DDR
* AirPort Extreme
* Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
* £1,339.01
Basically, I'd like your thoughts as to whether or not I could get away with the 17" as the price difference is quite considerable. It is going to be used mainly for word processing, email, multimedia (usage not processing) etc. so it doesn't need to be a beast of a machine! Is the extra .2Ghz paticularly noticable and would the 1GB of RAM suffice with the 17"?
Thanks in advance for your help