Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bob53

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 12, 2007
2
0
Hi all,

I've been lurking for several weeks and am on the brink of buying a new 20" imac... I've read the graphics card is sort of the weak point in this computer being more of a mobile GPU and not terrific for 3D rendering. This computer wil not be for (much) gaming, but there may be some in my "free" time... I plan to use it for Aperture, PS, iPhoto, etc for photography (I'm an amateur, so I do not need a Mac Pro) MS office for work, some UNIX based apps (work), and perhaps a few programs using parallels (some games).

My question: How "bad" is 128 Mb of GPU ram for my needs? I ask b/c buying the 256 Mb GPU ram costs quite a bit more, even with an academic discount, as the std 128 can be had from MacMall with a rebate, free shipping, and no taxes. All said, the 256 costs 150.00 more as MacMall does not stock it and so it is no different than myself buying from apple. The 256 gives 5% better performance, but I suspect there must be a few things like Aperture that might benefit from the extra GPU memory. Also, it sounds like core anamaiton may be more graphics intensive and this may favor the 256 model.

Thoughts?

Thx,

Bob
 

Jasonbot

macrumors 68020
Aug 15, 2006
2,467
0
The Rainbow Nation RSA
I have a 128. It rocks, its even good for the occasional game or two! I play FEAR with it and thats quite graphic intensive. never on high but I do play and tahts all that counts.
 

Roy Hobbs

macrumors 68000
Apr 29, 2005
1,862
286
Hi all,

I've been lurking for several weeks and am on the brink of buying a new 20" imac... I've read the graphics card is sort of the weak point in this computer being more of a mobile GPU and not terrific for 3D rendering. This computer wil not be for (much) gaming, but there may be some in my "free" time... I plan to use it for Aperture, PS, iPhoto, etc for photography (I'm an amateur, so I do not need a Mac Pro) MS office for work, some UNIX based apps (work), and perhaps a few programs using parallels (some games).

My question: How "bad" is 128 Mb of GPU ram for my needs? I ask b/c buying the 256 Mb GPU ram costs quite a bit more, even with an academic discount, as the std 128 can be had from MacMall with a rebate, free shipping, and no taxes. All said, the 256 costs 150.00 more as MacMall does not stock it and so it is no different than myself buying from apple. The 256 gives 5% better performance, but I suspect there must be a few things like Aperture that might benefit from the extra GPU memory. Also, it sounds like core anamaiton may be more graphics intensive and this may favor the 256 model.

Thoughts?

Thx,

Bob

Cost quite a bit more??? With Education discount the difference is $68
 

bob53

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 12, 2007
2
0
No... I have to pay tax on the order from mac, and if I order from MacMall, they only give the rebate if it is in stock. The upgrade is a not stocked. The difference comes out to be well over 100 dollars.

Bob
 

McGarvels

macrumors 6502
Nov 10, 2006
281
0
Irvine, CA
I would go with the 256MB. I have it on my 20" iMac and I absolutely love it. I bought my machine refurbished and was going to be content just getting the 128MB card, but luckily the refurb had a 256MB card in it (gotta love the surprises that come with refurbs). Anyways, with intensive games the 256MB card is great, I get a solid 60fps with Doom3 on the highest settings (through Bootcamp + WinXp of course). I dunno, I do agree with Phungy in the fact that it is not upgradeable later. This way you won't have any regrets not getting the 256MB card.

Cheers.
 

ChrisA

macrumors G5
Jan 5, 2006
12,918
2,169
Redondo Beach, California
If you intend to play 3D games the larger VRAM can cache more texture maps and can play smother in some case. But the larger VRAM is not any better if the programs you run don't need to load in a ton of texure map data.
 

BlizzardBomb

macrumors 68030
Jun 15, 2005
2,537
0
England
I think I've said before that the upgrade from 128 MB to 256 MB on an X1600 a relatively weak graphics card compared to what's out today will only be noticeable on head-to-head direct comparisons (it's only a few % faster). I personally don't think it's worth the money. I guess you should get some of your money back when it comes to selling and I think it may be offer a benefit psychologically in that you know you've got the best you could afford. OK, maybe this wasn't a very helpful post as it didn't offer an clear answer :p
 

bob909bob

macrumors member
Oct 20, 2005
55
0
Go for the 256. You won't be able to upgrade it in the future.

Yeah I have to agree with this. Upgrade if you can afford it. If not I think the 128 is good enough for you, but always buy the best you can afford.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.