Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

snowy-goofy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 7, 2006
15
0
Heya all, after Christmas I'm guy a new imac :)

specifications

Specifications

2.33GHz
2GB RAM
250GB HD
7600 GT

I was wondering if there is any difference between the 2, is it noticeable and is it worth the money?

I'm not a gamer (at all), but i love having a fast computer, also this will be my first mac :) so excited :)

thanks

cant wait
 

Demon Hunter

macrumors 68020
Mar 30, 2004
2,284
39
That depends on what you use your computer for... can you be more specific?

Also, if you're not a gamer, the 7600 GT upgrade may be unnecessary. In that case, I would use the money you save to upgrade the processor instead.
 

snowy-goofy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 7, 2006
15
0
lol i said guy instead of buy.

internet, word processing, some video and picture editing movies nothing big.

What is the difference between the 2 is it speed and is it alto faster or a bit?

thanks
 

Liong612

macrumors member
Nov 1, 2006
30
0
i have 2.33

The only reason i bought it because, you know how processor speed change like every week, i don't want to be out dated at least in a year or so.
It is more like the greedy side of me, i bought 2.33 ghz instead of the standard 2.13.
I don't think you will even notice the speed difference. Just buy the one you can afford.. and be happy with it.
 

Zwhaler

macrumors 604
Jun 10, 2006
7,267
1,965
I say got for the 2.33, like I did. Months after you get the computer, and the money is already spent, you will wish you had the faster model. My friend has the 2.16 and I notice a little speed difference in several applications, so I say go for it. Plus it's nice to know that you have the best :)
 

Dont Hurt Me

macrumors 603
Dec 21, 2002
6,055
6
Yahooville S.C.
All the newer Cpu's are fast these days, going from a 2.13 to 2.33 makes little difference in anything for the consumer. I would focus on other items video,Memory,hard drive space,Monitor size etc. Thats where you are going to make a difference. A 2.13 can do everything a 2.33 can or even 2.6 can. CPU's are just plenty fast across the board. I wouldnt even focus on the cpu.
 

snowy-goofy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 7, 2006
15
0
thanks guys good response :)

i think i am just gonna get the 2.33 just for the sake of it :)

like u said its nice knowing u have the best :)

if anyone plains on flaming me becuz i cant spell dont waste your time
 

Zwhaler

macrumors 604
Jun 10, 2006
7,267
1,965
Good move. In a year or two when this revision is slightly outdated, it will be all the more of a powerful machine because of upgrades like this that you took into consideration.
 

snowy-goofy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 7, 2006
15
0
i hate the idea that soon my machine will be outdated i no that everyday there will be a new technology , i wish everything would slow down just a bit so i can still say i have the best :)

thanks for all the replies :)
 

Zwhaler

macrumors 604
Jun 10, 2006
7,267
1,965
Don't worry about it. If we never bought the latest technology because we knew something would be coming out soon which is even better (which trust me, it always does) then we would never buy the product that we want because we would be endlessly waiting for something newer, and then we wouldn't ever have the computer we want.
 

beatsme

macrumors 65816
Oct 6, 2005
1,204
2
I have a 1.5Ghz Intel Mini, and it rules. Do yourself a favor: get as much memory as you can afford. I forget how much the thing supports (2GB, maybe?) but if you're doing video/moving picture editing, you're going to need it.
 

snowy-goofy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 7, 2006
15
0
yeah it goes up to 3GB ram but thats an extra $1070 i cant afford that much lol :( video and picture editing would take up maybe 3% of my overall time on the computer lol
 

K20

macrumors member
Nov 19, 2006
50
0
Torrance, CA
Nice move going for a 2.33. If you're not a gamer, I'd put the money into more hard drive space instead of dropping cash on the 7600GT.
 

mocman

macrumors regular
May 8, 2004
214
0
I was in the same spot as you about a week ago. I opted for the 2.16 because I was moving from a powermac g5 dual 1.8 tower. I read a ton of reviews and none stated that the 2.16 was slow enough to tell the diff.
I also went the refurb route and saved another $300.00 to add some ram after the new year.
 

furious

macrumors 65816
Aug 7, 2006
1,044
60
Australia
my dad is pissed at me for breaking the computer:mad: could be a chance to get them to join the cult.:p so i will go with 2.16 for budget.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.