Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gorby

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 20, 2007
263
0
So I just downloaded Supercal (http://bergdesign.com/supercal/) and ran the calibration...


The results were pretty good, a lot richer looking. The default iMac profile has always looked really bright-- but not just bright, but almost washed out looking (i.e. different shades of white/grey you commonly see on the net, didn't look so delineated)


So, from my own Supercal profile vs. the default iMac profile... mine wins easily. Then I checked out the "Adobe RBG (1998) profile" just to compare..... and it looks nearly the same as my Supercal profile--- except that it is not as warm. For now I am just using that.



What I'm wondering is: who is still using the default iMac profile.... and why does it look so 'bad'?


(btw this is the matte screen 24")
 
Used it as well, thank you! I now have some nice a rich colors and a great white balance!

:)
 
you can also calibrate from the imac settings in System Preferences. I did it that way, and am very pleased with the results.
 
Well I thought it was going really well but then I ended up with all the gray and some of the light blues being pinkish. I like the System Prefs way too.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.