Yes, any camera will produce an image, which can be imported onto your mac, but unless you can go direct from camera to mac, it's not a compatible camera. I don't view a 2 step multi day, extra hardware requiring, process as compatible when getting images from one device to another (finish film, send it for developing, wait for prints to be returned and then scan) The OP was clearly asking for recomendations for something that will directly plug into his mac and grab the images directly, 35mm film does not fulfiil that requirement.
You might as well say my paperback book is compatible, because what's to stop me typing it out?
Okay, I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you're being serious here, and not just loving the argument. If you want this to be your definition of compatible - fine. Knock yourself out. I stand by my previous answer.
I wasn't recommending the OP go the film route, just saying that he will not need to consider whether or not a camera can co-exist with Macs in his decision. Or what brand of PC, for that matter. So now all he has to decide is "what is a good camera..."
BTW: I used to go from film to digital file, processing the film myself, either printing a work print and scanning, or simply scanning the negative, complete with PP in 15-20 minutes, so you're just a bit off on your 2-day timeframe there. And, as
sahnert said, it's a snap to take film to a 1-hr processor for "processing only" (about 10 minutes if you wait) to scan at home, or have them scan it for you (easiest.) This information is more to let the OP know how wide his options really are, rather than him feeling limited somehow by his need for Mac-friendly choices. That's pretty basic.
Compatibility when using various computers/software was a very real issue in the days of SCSI and PC parallel ports when compared to today, but primarily for peripherals, not cameras. Cameras were cameras, independent things not dependent on computers. The compatibility issues were with devices designed to bridge the "analog to digital" gap, just like with any other digital technology. It never was a camera issue one way or the other. Today, any Mac (like in the old days) can connect to a film scanner and convert to digital... so film cameras
are compatible. You can
use them, and
not have to trade in your Mac for some other type of computer. Seriously. So much for the film issue...
Digital cameras are really more like electronic gadgets with lenses, and they were always Mac compatible from the beginning because they produced digital image files, whether they directly plugged into the computer
or not (card readers come to mind.) Pro digital camera raw files were more likely to be Mac compatible than not, and consumer digital cameras produced jpeg files...so they were Mac compatible. And last time I checked, that's still the case.
I think you know what I'm saying, and actually agree with this, but if you want to split hairs after this, you're on your own.