This thread is started in search of a for-sure-definitely-correct yes/no answer.
Looking around, I have not found any claims of 4k graphics coming out of a MacPro using open core.
My question is: Is 4k graphics out of MacPro 5,1 running Sequoia possible? If not, I need to get off this machine. If yes, then will begin diving into details I would rather ignore, but, there it is.
I installed Monterey using Martin Lo's open core. I didn't get the drivers the graphics needed, so I bailed off it.
What I need to know is whether I can run 4k with the most recent releases of MacOS on my machine. It is my understanding that some form of open core is a requirement for running those versions of macOS on this hardware
overdue upgrade of my 2012 MacPro 5,1
I use my mac for programming websites and databases, need current browsers running on it. Need 4k, really want dual 4k monitors, built one suffices. Can it be done with open core and Sequoia.
Catalina is running with the DosDude path, following one of is masterpiece videos.
UPON FURTHER REVIEW:
More data and a sophisticated analysis model, that I have not, are required for a definitive finding. That said, I am willing to risk exposing my ignorance, misunderstanding, poor instincts, and absolutely unjustified confidence in my perceptions pertaining to information technology, by offering this hypothesis without evidence except that which think I see here: 81 views without a comment in 5.5 hour time span in the MacRumors forum for MacPros says to me, IF there are any 2012 MacPro 5,1 machines producing 4k output running Sequoia, there are not many, it is not common, it might well not be possible.
I suspect it is possible. Can't say for sure without seeing it done or hearing terrific analysis by someone who knows a lot, such as the 20% of the membership here that lead the MacOS understanding and practices of the world.
Bonus unverified observation: I don't see too many of the developer jocks who who for Apple identifying themselves and sharing their knowledge at MacRumors. I might start a thread to inquire about that one.
Looking around, I have not found any claims of 4k graphics coming out of a MacPro using open core.
My question is: Is 4k graphics out of MacPro 5,1 running Sequoia possible? If not, I need to get off this machine. If yes, then will begin diving into details I would rather ignore, but, there it is.
I installed Monterey using Martin Lo's open core. I didn't get the drivers the graphics needed, so I bailed off it.
What I need to know is whether I can run 4k with the most recent releases of MacOS on my machine. It is my understanding that some form of open core is a requirement for running those versions of macOS on this hardware
overdue upgrade of my 2012 MacPro 5,1
I use my mac for programming websites and databases, need current browsers running on it. Need 4k, really want dual 4k monitors, built one suffices. Can it be done with open core and Sequoia.
Catalina is running with the DosDude path, following one of is masterpiece videos.
UPON FURTHER REVIEW:
More data and a sophisticated analysis model, that I have not, are required for a definitive finding. That said, I am willing to risk exposing my ignorance, misunderstanding, poor instincts, and absolutely unjustified confidence in my perceptions pertaining to information technology, by offering this hypothesis without evidence except that which think I see here: 81 views without a comment in 5.5 hour time span in the MacRumors forum for MacPros says to me, IF there are any 2012 MacPro 5,1 machines producing 4k output running Sequoia, there are not many, it is not common, it might well not be possible.
I suspect it is possible. Can't say for sure without seeing it done or hearing terrific analysis by someone who knows a lot, such as the 20% of the membership here that lead the MacOS understanding and practices of the world.
Bonus unverified observation: I don't see too many of the developer jocks who who for Apple identifying themselves and sharing their knowledge at MacRumors. I might start a thread to inquire about that one.
Last edited: