Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

hajime

macrumors G3
Original poster
Jul 23, 2007
8,098
1,382
Hello, have been looking for a 40-45" 4K monitor for a year. Looks like monitors in this range all have some kind of issues. How come? For those who have been using 4K TV in this 40-45" size range, how is your experience? What are the pros and cons of using 4K TV instead? Is it better to get one with HDR and 120MHz?

I plan to mainly use it for programming, matlab, CAD, writing and reading pdfs perhaps with some gaming.
 
I have to ask - what viewing distance do you use for these enormous displays? I have a 21.5" external monitor at my home and work desks that I plug my 13" MBP into, and I find it to be quite comfortable. I don't want to be rolling around and straining my neck to see the entire screen, and I like the higher pixel density.
 
Yes. I used a 42" 4K TV and I miss playing some games on it. I miss how much it takes up your vision and being able to see and shoot at tiny people easy. (I switched to a 21:9 monitor for the refresh rate)
 
Theoretically speaking yes but as Dethklok mentioned, pay attention to the refresh rate if your applications are motion oriented.
 
what viewing distance do you use for these enormous displays?
I am still reminded that people see things, well, differently. I have always had my monitors located beyond arm's length (and I have simian-like arms!). It's apparently not good or bad at this distance - my optometrist always asks how far my monitor is from my head, and works from there. I have friends who can't get their monitor close enough, and all but complain that the keyboard is in the way.
 
The answer is YES! No plan to go back to monitors again.
 
If you get a 4K TV to use as your computer's display, I'd advise against getting an OLED display, because static images (like your user interface) can cause it to burn in.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.