Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

moonman239

Cancelled
Original poster
Mar 27, 2009
1,541
32
Let's say a Supreme Court judge found Apple to be infringing on a patent with the iPhone 4S & the iPad 2 & 3. Would people have to give up their iPad 2 or iPad 3 or iPhone 4S? Would they be allowed to sell the devices on Craigslist?

I think whoever owns any of the devices would be allowed to keep or sell the devices. After all, it is theirs. As a matter of fact, people would probably be willing to pay more money just to buy a used device because they wouldn't be able to find it at an Apple store or on apple.com
 

miles01110

macrumors Core
Jul 24, 2006
19,260
37
The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
Let's say a Supreme Court judge found Apple to be infringing on a patent with the iPhone 4S & the iPad 2 & 3. Would people have to give up their iPad 2 or iPad 3 or iPhone 4S? Would they be allowed to sell the devices on Craigslist?

Perhaps you're confused about how the Supreme Court works. Judges cannot make unilateral decisions on cases, and patent cases rarely make it all the way to the Supreme Court in the first case.

Anyway, it's virtually inconceivable that the Court would order everyone to give up their iPads or iPhones.

----MITT ROMNEY FOR US PRESIDENT!----

Should have known.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.