Both are the same, as ALAC can do 24 bit high sample rate. My files are only CD quality, as I rip from CD, and I bet my headphones and speakers are not HiFi enough to hear the difference between that and higher sample rate files. But if you have nicer cans, it might edge out a little bit. But the older you get, the less your ears hear. So once you reach a certain age, having higher than CD quality sound might not matter that much. Sounds between 16 KHz and 20 kHz are definitely lower on my hearing scale, so I don't need high sample rate. 24 bit 48 kHz audio should be all I need, but CD quality is good enough for me.FLAC because it sounds better
Have you tried with VLC on the iPhone? It has a file manager built in.I thought since 2017 you could play FLAC in iPhones, but if you can't put FLAC in iTunes, how are you supposed to put FLAC files in an iPhone?
Yes, I think you can play FLAC files with specific players, but if you need iPhone native Music app, then ALAC is the way to go, and there should not be any difference in sound between that and FLAC at the same bitrate and sample rate as both are lossless.Have you tried with VLC on the iPhone? It has a file manager built in.
Nonsense. Lossless is lossless.FLAC because it sounds better
Thank you for saying that! I had an urge to yell that out loud.Nonsense. Lossless is lossless.
Lossless is lossless and sounds like the source.
This bits may be the same, but in a FLAC container they sound "warmer" and more authentic. Yes, that is sarcasm.Lossless is lossless and sounds like the source.
Is there a reason you use FLAC instead of ALAC?Love it FLAC here, VOX player is the best, btw uploading tracks to VOX Cloud![]()
DL a lot flac music in what.cd a longtime agoIs there a reason you use FLAC instead of ALAC?