I'm thinking about complementing my 7D Mark II with a full frame camera.
Being heavily invested in Canon lenses, for me only the 5D Mark IV and 5Ds R look to be options within a reasonable budget in the used market.
As an amateur, the 7D II made the most sense as far as bang for buck, especially since bird and wildlife photography is my main interest, but I made sure any lens I bought was full frame compatible, just in case.
On my recent trip, I rented a 6D Mark II to have a back up, but also to get the most out of my wide lenses.
Well, the 6D II didn't convince me, so the 5D series is what I'm looking at.
The 5D Mark IV can be had used for around $2000.
The 5Ds R seems to be around $1700 used.
My question for someone that has ideally used both, is it worth the extra cost for the newer 5D IV or will I be happier with the 50MP 5Ds R?
This camera will be mainly used for landscape and nightscape photography, maybe a couple portraits.
Thanks for any input!
Being heavily invested in Canon lenses, for me only the 5D Mark IV and 5Ds R look to be options within a reasonable budget in the used market.
As an amateur, the 7D II made the most sense as far as bang for buck, especially since bird and wildlife photography is my main interest, but I made sure any lens I bought was full frame compatible, just in case.
On my recent trip, I rented a 6D Mark II to have a back up, but also to get the most out of my wide lenses.
Well, the 6D II didn't convince me, so the 5D series is what I'm looking at.
The 5D Mark IV can be had used for around $2000.
The 5Ds R seems to be around $1700 used.
My question for someone that has ideally used both, is it worth the extra cost for the newer 5D IV or will I be happier with the 50MP 5Ds R?
This camera will be mainly used for landscape and nightscape photography, maybe a couple portraits.
Thanks for any input!