I'm picking up a Canon Rebel XS in the next few weeks here and i really love taking macro photos.
Anyone here with a Canon macro lens that they are happy with???
Any advice will be appreciated!!
Thank you!
The EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM is an excellent lens, and not too expensive. You can do a lot with this lens alone, but later may want to buy a ring flash, and also a set of Kenko tubes.
The ring flash is very useful when the subject is in the dark (low light conditions). However, a lot of photos can be taken without the aid of a ring flash during the day when there is a lot of light. With the use of a Kenko tube, you can get the front glass of the lens very close to the subject. For example, you may want to photograph the head of a grasshopper instead of the whole subject. In this case, a Kenko tube allows you to get within a few millimeters from the subject. So all depends on how close you want to get to it.
Canon makes real good macro lenses. I am very happy with the macro lens I mentioned above. I can get very close to the subject and still maintain a short distance between us (about 12"). A lens of 300mm with macro capability would give me a wider safety zone (around 4 feet or so).
Some of the best Canon macro lenses:
-MP-E 65 ($819.00) I believe this is a manual focus lens only, but it's a favorite with macro photographers, and perhaps the sharpest around.
-EF 100mm f.2.8 Macro USM ($470.00). This is my favorite. It's very sharp, and has auto/manual-focusing. I can use it for macro photography, or as a 100mm telephoto with outo focusing.
Canon makes a few other macro lenses, most of which can be found here:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=141406
You may want to visit the Macro Forum at the home page, "photography-on-the.net/," and ask about the favorite macro lenses. Look at the macros of "Lord V" and you will be amazed.
The stock lens won't take macro shots. You'll actually need a macro lens to get the right results.
It's not as long, but the 60mm macro is actually pretty awesome. It serves as a really sharp portrait lens too.
So your saying i cant use the macro feature with the supplied lens??
Well i guess im just confused. My $250 Canon SD750 takes macro photos that are some what decent.
you guys are saying i wont be able to take up close photos with the standard lens?
Close photos aren't necessarily the same as macro photos. It's a focusing issue. There are minimum focusing distances for almost all lenses. Imagine a huge telephoto lens, 2 inches from the subject -- should that be an amazing macro shot? Won't work! You can always go crazy with cropping and make something look like you were right next to it -- but that doesn't make it a true macro.
The SD750 may have had a "macro mode" but whether it actually focuses down to 1:1 is unclear. Lots of lenses get close, but a true macro lens is labeled as such because it operates differently.
The stock lens won't take macro shots. You'll actually need a macro lens to get the right results.
It's not as long, but the 60mm macro is actually pretty awesome. It serves as a really sharp portrait lens too.
Ok, im starting to understand. Im sorry im just new to this and its all a bit over whelming!
Well i guess im just confused. My $250 Canon SD750 takes macro photos that are some what decent.
you guys are saying i wont be able to take up close photos with the standard lens?
You remind me of me when I started out in SLR photography. The answer to your question is that any SLR with the kit lens is nowhere near as versatile as your SD750. That's why a lot of people have trouble getting into this SLR business. You need a lot more lenses to even come close to the versatility.
Well, you could start with the kit lens and get extension tubes? They start at $60 and are quite a bit cheaper than real macro lenses.The stock lens won't take macro shots. You'll actually need a macro lens to get the right results.
If you get a reversing ring (about $5 on ebay) you can flip your kit lens around and mount it on your body.