Hi guys,
I'm looking at picking up a dslr from canon, to start up some sports and landscape/outdoors shooting. What I'm looking for is a cheap started dslr with fast burst shots and good image quality. I've chosen canon because of my experience with xt and xti rebels and with the xl1 and xlh1 cameras, as well as when I do get a xlh1, the lenses will be compatible. I can get the xs with the 18-55 kit lenses, and the 55-250 lens for 528 fr b&h. I can also get the xsi with the image stabilized zoom lens for 789.
Do you guys think that for my uses that the xsi with it's faster burst rate, specially in raw, would be better for my uses, also cuz the extra telephoto is image stabilized, that means I'll be able to go handheld instead of relying on the monopod entirely. Is that worth the extra money you guys think? I'll be stopping by b&h tommorow to possiblybuy.
I'm looking at picking up a dslr from canon, to start up some sports and landscape/outdoors shooting. What I'm looking for is a cheap started dslr with fast burst shots and good image quality. I've chosen canon because of my experience with xt and xti rebels and with the xl1 and xlh1 cameras, as well as when I do get a xlh1, the lenses will be compatible. I can get the xs with the 18-55 kit lenses, and the 55-250 lens for 528 fr b&h. I can also get the xsi with the image stabilized zoom lens for 789.
Do you guys think that for my uses that the xsi with it's faster burst rate, specially in raw, would be better for my uses, also cuz the extra telephoto is image stabilized, that means I'll be able to go handheld instead of relying on the monopod entirely. Is that worth the extra money you guys think? I'll be stopping by b&h tommorow to possiblybuy.