Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

udflyer

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 3, 2011
424
104
I went to create a new partition and Disk Utility really tries to lead you to a new volume instead.

Does it matter which I create to test out Catalina?

TIA
 

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,896
Stalingrad, Russia
I was under the impression that APFS volumes usually share an existing container and therefore are not bootable. Partition on the other hand creates a new container and is bootable. What did I miss?
 

stormchasejg

macrumors 6502
Sep 22, 2014
347
247
East Preston, UK
I was under the impression that APFS volumes usually share an existing container and therefore are not bootable. Partition on the other hand creates a new container and is bootable. What did I miss?
Apple actually has a support document for using APFS Volumes to install macOS https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208891 works fine and boots just done it today
 

haralds

macrumors 68030
Jan 3, 2014
2,990
1,252
Silicon Valley, CA
I was under the impression that APFS volumes usually share an existing container and therefore are not bootable. Partition on the other hand creates a new container and is bootable. What did I miss?
They are bootable. There can be hidden size issues. I just added an APFS container to a larger disk and then realized that I needed more space on that new container. I deleted a bunch of files in the other did not free up the space I needed.
Note that the installer will create a second APFS container for the data portion of the install.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: olad and avz

avz

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2018
1,828
1,896
Stalingrad, Russia
They are bootable. There can be hidden size issues. I just added an APFS container to a larger disk and then realized that I needed more space on that new container. I deleted a bunch of files in the other did not free up the space I needed.
Note that the installer will create a second APFS container for the data portion of the install.

So in essence I could have a Macintosh SSD and High Sierra as bootable volumes both under the Container disk1? No need for container disk2?

Screen Shot 2019-06-05 at 7.27.23 am.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.