What useless critics around these parts.
I think the design is fantastic. I got that it was a question mark right away. I enjoy the type, it's very.. hearkening to period/Shag/sign painter aesthetic.
That said, design makes questions grow wild? As wild as a plant's roots? (Aren't those kind of slow and immobile by nature?) Kind of a weak and vague marketing concept and iconic linkage.. but I don't know if that was your doing or not. But the design is lovely.
It's a sketch that I made tell me what you think.
![]()
Then why arent you assuming its meant to be a hanger? If you were able to tell its a question mark without him telling you then I would say it probably looks like one.I'm assuming its meant to be a question mark but it doesn't look like one to me, it looks like a coat hanger with the triangle ripped away
What if the circle was dangling from one of the roots like it was a beet or something?
This for sure. As it stands, the question mark is incomplete. Which on one hand may be the point as in "questions (ideas) are formed, grown, etc with design." Although overall I don't associate a question mark with ideas as such, but that's just me. I would maybe add a leaf or two on the question mark to signify the growth. Right now it might be seen as a half-formed question that has died, hence ripping it out of the ground.
The typography is good, but I don't like the "L" in wild. Since it's lower case, there are far too many vertical lines happening especially with the exclamation mark in place. It's on the verge of being confusing as to what the word is at first glance. Wildi? Wildi? Wildl? Oh.. It's Wild! In fact it took me a moment to figure it out because the image doesn't really convey the idea to me as such.