Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Samtb

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jan 6, 2013
1,507
34
Are the Nikon 1 series cameras good for low light shots? And can they still easily beat photos taken on iPhone cameras? I’m looking for a compact camera for low light shots.
 

Cheese&Apple

macrumors 68010
Jun 5, 2012
2,004
6,606
Toronto
Are the Nikon 1 series cameras good for low light shots? And can they still easily beat photos taken on iPhone cameras? I’m looking for a compact camera for low light shots.
"Low light" and "compact" are very subjective. How low do you want to go and what image quality are you looking for in low light? Generally, the larger the sensor and the lower the resolution the better the camera will handle noise at high ISO's.

Without flash, the Nikon 1 will be better than an iPhone. A full frame camera will be better than a Nikon 1 and there are other sensor sizes between the Nikon 1 and full frame.
 

Samtb

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jan 6, 2013
1,507
34
"Low light" and "compact" are very subjective. How low do you want to go and what image quality are you looking for in low light? Generally, the larger the sensor and the lower the resolution the better the camera will handle noise at high ISO's.

Without flash, the Nikon 1 will be better than an iPhone. A full frame camera will be better than a Nikon 1 and there are other sensor sizes between the Nikon 1 and full frame.
I don’t want to go as high as a full frame camera as they tend to be bigger and more bulky and I don’t require the quality of a high end DSLR. But I find iPhones can’t do anything in low light. By low light I mean, for example a street with only dim street lamps. But I even find nightscapes difficult with iPhones. They just blur.
 

Cheese&Apple

macrumors 68010
Jun 5, 2012
2,004
6,606
Toronto
I don’t want to go as high as a full frame camera as they tend to be bigger and more bulky and I don’t require the quality of a high end DSLR. But I find iPhones can’t do anything in low light. By low light I mean, for example a street with only dim street lamps. But I even find nightscapes difficult with iPhones. They just blur.
Based on your example I would suggest any entry level camera with a tripod mount (threaded female socket on the bottom of the camera). You'll need a camera that allows you to select an exposure time. Mount the camera to a tripod and shoot long exposures anywhere from a fraction of a second to 30 seconds. It's the only way to do it.

Just a heads-up that long exposures generally work with static (non-moving) subjects such as a street scene under street lamps. Anything that moves will be blurred - that's ok but only if that's your intent. To photograph subjects like moving people in low light and have them sharp (frozen in action), is a whole different ballgame that will require off camera lighting.
 

Samtb

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jan 6, 2013
1,507
34
Based on your example I would suggest any entry level camera with a tripod mount (threaded female socket on the bottom of the camera). You'll need a camera that allows you to select an exposure time. Mount the camera to a tripod and shoot long exposures anywhere from a fraction of a second to 30 seconds. It's the only way to do it.

Just a heads-up that long exposures generally work with static (non-moving) subjects such as a street scene under street lamps. Anything that moves will be blurred - that's ok but only if that's your intent. To photograph subjects like moving people in low light and have them sharp (frozen in action), is a whole different ballgame that will require off camera lighting.
Will an iPhone do it with a good camera app?
 

dwig

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2015
908
449
Key West FL
Are the Nikon 1 series cameras good for low light shots? And can they still easily beat photos taken on iPhone cameras? I’m looking for a compact camera for low light shots.

Something like the Panasonic LX100 would likely be a better choice. One thing to look for is a fast lens, f/2.0 or faster. The "kit" zooms on the Nikon 1 series are rather slow.
 

ChrisA

macrumors G5
Jan 5, 2006
12,919
2,172
Redondo Beach, California
Will an iPhone do it with a good camera app?

You'd still need the tripod. Even if the app allows you to set a long exposure time that is of no use unless the iPhone is he'd very firmly still.

Also with a tripod and long exposure you need some way to trip the sutter that does not involve touching the camera. A delay timer on the camera app does that. The delay allows the iPhone to shop shaking. Wind is also an issue, typically photographers will wait for a lull in the wind if doing long exposures. Any camera shake caused by a finger tap or the wind will blue the image. Better to just get a more sensitive camera

For low-light, as in outdoors at night shooting subjects that move, you are going to need a quite large sensor. And also, just as importantly a FAST lens. Look for a lens that is at least f/1.8 and if you can get it, f/1.4 To get a lens like that you'd need some kind of camera with interchangeable lenses. I think any modern mirrorless system has this.

Also a wider lens will cause less motion blur. look for a wide angle f/1.4 and an APS size sensor (or DX in nikon-speak, they are all about 23x14mm, roughly 1/2 the size of "Full Frame" 35mm film.

In short, look for fast lens and large sensor.
 
Last edited:

StoneJack

macrumors 68030
Dec 19, 2009
2,730
1,983
Nikon P310 which I have or its later models like p330 are good choices for compact, low-light shooting cameras. The lens is fast 1.8, and sensor is quite good.
Some examples

untitled by Kay Ohsu, on Flickr
 

Gaprofitt

macrumors 6502
Jul 30, 2009
322
475
LX100 is super old, but a great camera. I would go with something from Fuji like the XT20..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.