This is a dumb question. Please indulge.
I am just thinking these at the moment because this might be irrelevant by next Spring when the new processors come out.
However, there are many people who say that a Mac Mini M1 can "replace" a $5,000-$10,000 iMac Pro or Mac Pro rig for some cases. However the bottlenecks come when you have to do some very heavy CPU/GPU task and are left with some slowdowns/swapping during those peak performances.
However what if you buy three Mac Minis and have one primary, then use the two as secondary or servers. So for example you throw the encoding/compiling task on the secondary machines and have your primary running butter? You still have a Mac Mini bill of $2,700 for the three and still be compelling work rig.
Is there a workable way to get the 2 or 3 mac mini working together? Is this not one of the creative ways that Mac Minis are used?
I am just thinking these at the moment because this might be irrelevant by next Spring when the new processors come out.
However, there are many people who say that a Mac Mini M1 can "replace" a $5,000-$10,000 iMac Pro or Mac Pro rig for some cases. However the bottlenecks come when you have to do some very heavy CPU/GPU task and are left with some slowdowns/swapping during those peak performances.
However what if you buy three Mac Minis and have one primary, then use the two as secondary or servers. So for example you throw the encoding/compiling task on the secondary machines and have your primary running butter? You still have a Mac Mini bill of $2,700 for the three and still be compelling work rig.
Is there a workable way to get the 2 or 3 mac mini working together? Is this not one of the creative ways that Mac Minis are used?