#1 and it should be FREE
#1, but I'll spend the extra time and use mobile Safari rather than pay for an app that does virtually the same thing (although faster).
But even so, I would be willing to pay for a more refined, iphone specific app
you all are whiners.....they should be able to charge for their app. to help with the cost of time and labor put into the app.
I like the first as well.
But $3.00? No. The app does not hold $3 worth of value.
Instead of starting an entirely new thread, just 2 quick questions: Can you view pictures using this app? Can you see more than the most recent 100 listings? TIA
When someone solicits advice about an app, all bets are off.
No one is saying they shouldn't be able to charge for the app. When someone solicits advice about an app, all bets are off.
Why are all bets off? Can we insult his mother? Crikey, the guy asked for advice about the gui, can't we just give him advice about the gui.
If not enough people buy his app, he'll have to lower his price, or make it ad supported or something.
I like number 1, BTW.