How likely the latest Mac Minis will run Snow Leopard? It's got a Intel C2D however the integrated graphic card is extremely weak.
I don't see any way that any Intel-based Mac won't run Snow Leopard. The graphics card usually isn't a big deal in basic operation of the OS. In fact, I'd bet it'll run on any G5 system, maybe some faster G4 systems.
SL will be supported on all Intel Macs...or at least I can't see Apple doing it any other way.
Well I am thinking of buying a new 1.83ghz one, with 1 gb ram. It's economical times.
Yeah I do think it's overpriced currently given the specs, however as said, it will do whatever I want just fine. I ain't doing any intensive 3d work or games so the GPU doesn't really matter to me. But still, if I buy a new one at full retail price and suddenly after 2 weeks the Mini refresh hits, I would still feel like crap.
How likely the latest Mac Minis will run Snow Leopard? It's got a Intel C2D however the integrated graphic card is extremely weak.
Yeah I do think it's overpriced currently given the specs, however as said, it will do whatever I want just fine. I ain't doing any intensive 3d work or games so the GPU doesn't really matter to me. But still, if I buy a new one at full retail price and suddenly after 2 weeks the Mini refresh hits, I would still feel like crap.
The 9400m is NOT a poor onboard GPU, it's a really great one actually. The 9400m has CUDA support and can also be used in OpenCL. On the Macrumors frontpage there is this article about OpenCL support which is mentioning the following:I think the benefits of SnowLeaopard won't show through on an intel Macmini ... it has a poor on-board GPU ... it seems that snowleopard really wants a high-power GPU to shine... with grand central etc .... it'll work but given no major new feature i think it might be a waste of cash
Note the difference between the "weak" 9400m and the "powerful" 9600m GT... The "weak" one can keep up with the "powerful" one, that's how "weak" it is...In this particular example, the benchmark performance of the user's MacBook Pro CPU and two discrete GPUs were as follows (smaller numbers faster):
GeForce 9600M GT: 2.805 seconds
GeForce 9400M: 3.081 seconds
Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.40GHz: 15.459 seconds
The 9400m is NOT a poor onboard GPU, it's a really great one actually. The 9400m has CUDA support and can also be used in OpenCL. On the Macrumors frontpage there is this article about OpenCL support which is mentioning the following:
Note the difference between the "weak" 9400m and the "powerful" 9600m GT... The "weak" one can keep up with the "powerful" one, that's how "weak" it is...
Not to mention the 9400m does a great job at supplying a 30" monitor with the necessary data. It runs effects/animations from Spaces, Exposé, etc. smoothly on a 30" monitor. The same goes for 2 24" monitors.
*More stuff here*
Do note that I covered everything from the GMA950 to the now used 9400mDo note the date of that post - January, two months before the current minis
Aren't necroposts fun?