Mr. Anderson said:
Take a tour: Georgetown and NW DC and then go to Anacostia - its not pretty.
I'm a relatively recent transplant to DC, but I have a friend who lived here his whole life before college. He said, "you don't cross the anacostia river - ever. Not even in a car, not ever." I knew another guy who worked at the naval base on the anacostia river, and he said that even the soldiers going to the base would get off the Metro and
run to the base. They called it "the anacostia sprint." And these were young soldiers in a group.
Chip NoVaMac said:
I think the issue is making juveniles, as the Wash Post pointed out in the Friday edition - pay the adult price for their crime.
I agree with you about making these kids serve adult sentences. Rape is an adult crime, murder is an adult crime, drug trafficking is an adult crime, carrying guns is an adult crime. If you're adult enough to commit these crimes, you're adult enough to pay the penalty. I disagree about the death penalty, though. I'm categorically against it. But a 20+ year prison sentence, even for a 14 year old? Absolutely.
dsyntax said:
its certainly wrong to treat juvenile offenders as adults.
Bull. These are hardened felons. Did you read the article I linked in the first post? Some of these "kids" have been arrested for felonies 3, 4, 6, 10 times by the time they're 15. They know exactly what they're doing; they just don't care. Let them out and they're right back to the gangs and the streets, right back to sticking guns in people's faces for $5.
And let's be honest: no 16 year-old who murders someone is going free at 21, thats a huge exaggeration. Juveniles are dealt with differentently from adults in many justive systems, but it is certainly not that extreme.
Probably a murderer is not going to get out (though he well could), but a rapist, an armed robber, a drug runner? Yes, they absolutely will be out by 21. Getting locked up is a joke to these kids; they're back out before you can blink.
DZ/015 said:
The answer to this problem is simple. Lift the gun ban that is in place on law-abiding citizens.
The problem here is that these criminals are so poor, so desperate, and so numbed to violence that they don't see any way out except a life of crime. Solutions such as more police on the streets and innocent people carrying guns may deter crime in some instances, but real change would require a much more systemic approach.
This war needs to be fought in both the short and long terms. First, there need to be many more police on the streets, especially in bad neighborhoods and at peak-crime times. There also need to be very serious "adult" sentences for all violent felons, no matter their age.
Second, there needs to structural change. That means a lot more money pumped in to DC in general and bad areas in particular (just look what the Verizon Center has done to Chinatown) and massive education reform so that these "hopeless" youths see themselves as having options other than crime.
Too often these positions get misrepresented - we can acknowledge that we need social change without excusing individual felons. Let's lock up the criminals of today, but stop the criminals of tomorrow from ever developing.