Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Blorzoga

macrumors 68030
Original poster
May 21, 2010
2,560
66
If Apple management knew that Steve Jobs' cancer had returned and did not disclose that Apple's founder was terminally ill, do shareholders have a valid complaint? When he appeared on stage for ipad2 looking thin and frail, the official statement from Apple was that his condition was the result of his "recovering from a bout with a common bug, that's all there is to it". Had an investor purchased Apple stock with the belief that SJ was not terminally ill, that he was merely suffering from a common cold, only to have him pass away shortly thereafter, and then have his investment plummet in value, the investor might be able to claim securities fraud.
 

TC25

macrumors 68020
Mar 28, 2011
2,201
0
Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel for a thread topic. :rolleyes:
 

steve dave

macrumors 6502a
Mar 29, 2010
538
11
If Apple management knew that Steve Jobs' cancer had returned and did not disclose that Apple's founder was terminally ill, do shareholders have a valid complaint? When he appeared on stage for ipad2 looking thin and frail, the official statement from Apple was that his condition was the result of his "recovering from a bout with a common bug, that's all there is to it". Had an investor purchased Apple stock with the belief that SJ was not terminally ill, that he was merely suffering from a common cold, only to have him pass away shortly thereafter, and then have his investment plummet in value, the investor might be able to claim securities fraud.

Since when did everyone get a sense such a sense of entitlement that a person's medical condition is no longer private?
 

Blorzoga

macrumors 68030
Original poster
May 21, 2010
2,560
66
Since when did everyone get a sense such a sense of entitlement that a person's medical condition is no longer private?

Apple is a public company. Investors have a right to know certain things, including conditions that are known by management that might affect the health of the company.

----------

you mad, bro?

Nope
 

steve dave

macrumors 6502a
Mar 29, 2010
538
11
Apple is a public company. Investors have a right to know certain things, including conditions that are known by management that might affect the health of the company.

----------



Nope


wrong. They have no right to know anything about his medical condition. If they were that worried about it then investors should have compelled the board to replace him. The fact is that investors were to busy riding the gravy train that they really didn't give a crap about his health as long as they were raking it in. Now that the ride might be over everyone wants to piss and moan about it. They have no right to delve into his personal medical condition.
 

Blorzoga

macrumors 68030
Original poster
May 21, 2010
2,560
66
wrong. They have no right to know anything about his medical condition. If they were that worried about it then investors should have compelled the board to replace him. The fact is that investors were to busy riding the gravy train that they really didn't give a crap about his health as long as they were raking it in. Now that the ride might be over everyone wants to piss and moan about it. They have no right to delve into his personal medical condition.

So, if Warren Buffet had a stroke and was incapacitated, then shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway shouldn't be informed?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.