I don't mean electrical power, though I suppose that would be part of the computation. The question though is, am I the only person who has a line item in their budget for what they spend on computers each month?
I have seen a lot of posts about how people don't need the power of these processors. I'm a dev and know the power will be used. Just wait.
In any case, I have a budget and I include what I spend on computers as part of it.
I went with 16/max/32/64/1tb since all other computers are paid off and it was within my 2 year budget (assume trade-in to M-X). With the trade in of my 2018 i9 it will cost me ~$104/month for the next 2 years.
This is simply a no-brainer for me. The time savings for my workflows will easily pay for this several times over. And I will have a high value trade-in in a couple years.
Am I the only one who looks at their compute resources this way?
I have seen a lot of posts about how people don't need the power of these processors. I'm a dev and know the power will be used. Just wait.
In any case, I have a budget and I include what I spend on computers as part of it.
I went with 16/max/32/64/1tb since all other computers are paid off and it was within my 2 year budget (assume trade-in to M-X). With the trade in of my 2018 i9 it will cost me ~$104/month for the next 2 years.
This is simply a no-brainer for me. The time savings for my workflows will easily pay for this several times over. And I will have a high value trade-in in a couple years.
Am I the only one who looks at their compute resources this way?