Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

YS2003

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Dec 24, 2004
2,138
0
Finally I have arrived.....
Now that Intel transition is chugging along at Apple, I am thinking Macs with intel chips may be updated more frequently than Power PC based Macs of the yore. Do you think Apple will shorten the product update cycle because of the faster chip update by Intel? Intel's road map for the upcoming chips is very aggressive compared to snail-mail pace of Power PC chip development.
 

zorg

macrumors regular
May 3, 2006
184
0
I think they might be updated as much as PCs. Which is to say...not often.
 

4God

macrumors 68020
Apr 5, 2005
2,133
267
My Mac
YS2003 said:
Do you think Intel Mac will be updated more frequently than Power PC Mac?

Only if we can update them ourselves - ie: swap out the socketed processor :D
 

direzz

macrumors 6502
Jan 12, 2006
278
0
i think its fundamental. apple will try to continue their old ways but will realize they need to keep up with dell, etc.

i mean, look at how much choice dell offers in its consumer and pro laptop line. 15+ different models!
 

D34th

macrumors regular
Apr 14, 2006
186
0
Connecticut
4God said:
Only if we can update them ourselves - ie: swap out the socketed processor :D

My thoughts exactly. That would be fully sufficient for me, what else would you need to upgrade, besides RAM, and thats easy?
 

Shamus

macrumors 6502a
Feb 26, 2006
651
0
Perhaps we will see more frequent 'quiet' upgrades, with now glorious notification. ie. increase processor from 2ghz to 2.16ghz.

Just an idea.
 

FocusAndEarnIt

macrumors 601
May 29, 2005
4,628
1,112
Yeah, probably just what Shamus said - although probably not frequently.

Never know, really.
 

Dont Hurt Me

macrumors 603
Dec 21, 2002
6,055
6
Yahooville S.C.
The answer is no but when they do upgrade there will be bigger jumps then the very slight bumps we have had over the years with PPC. Thats my take.
 

sunfast

macrumors 68020
Oct 14, 2005
2,135
53
Shamus said:
Perhaps we will see more frequent 'quiet' upgrades, with now glorious notification. ie. increase processor from 2ghz to 2.16ghz

That makes sense. Minor upgrades reasonably regularly (or at least price drops) as new processors become quicker and old ones become cheaper.
 

motulist

macrumors 601
Dec 2, 2003
4,235
611
Apple has a history of doing several silent revisions to it's products before officially releasing the next version of the product with upgraded features. These revisions usually include things like fixing problems on the motherboard or replacing problematic components. The Mac Mini recently even had a silent unannounced upgrade to the processor speed even though it wasn't guaranteed which speed processor you'd get, the slower one which you paid for and is printed on the box or the faster chip they were unofficially introducing. I think this type of unofficial incremental processor speed bump is likely to happen again in the future as slightly faster chips are periodically released by Intel.
 

MisterMe

macrumors G4
Jul 17, 2002
10,709
69
USA
YS2003 said:
Now that Intel transition is chugging along at Apple, I am thinking Macs with intel chips may be updated more frequently than Power PC based Macs of the yore. Do you think Apple will shorten the product update cycle because of the faster chip update by Intel? Intel's road map for the upcoming chips is very aggressive compared to snail-mail pace of Power PC chip development.
Define your terms. If by update you mean clock increase, then you answer is obvious. The answer is "yes." Apple is now buying processors from Intel's catalog. Intel is not going to keep slow processors in its inventory just for Apple. For Apple's part, you are never going to hear this conversation:

Intel: We've got some new 4.1 GHz Conroes hot off the foundries.

Apple: Let Dell have them. We're sticking with the 3.9's, thank you.
 

redAPPLE

macrumors 68030
May 7, 2002
2,680
6
2 Much Infinite Loops
is this a poll? no? anyway, i would vote "no".

Intel: We've got some new 4.1 GHz Conroes hot off the foundries.

Apple: Let Dell have them. We're sticking with the 3.9's, thank you.

if i remember correctly. we macusers, some call us fanboys, we frown at mere speed bumps. we always push apple to bring out computers with speed bumps and other goodies that comes with the computer, not to mention it is better for SJ's ego.
 

lord patton

macrumors 65816
Jun 6, 2005
1,052
12
Chicago
Shamus said:
Perhaps we will see more frequent 'quiet' upgrades, with now glorious notification. ie. increase processor from 2ghz to 2.16ghz.

Just an idea.

agreed.

Consider the introduction of the Intel iMac: it was released within one week of the Core Duo rollout. And for obvious reasons: everyone else was putting them in their computers. Apple had to, as well.

I suspect the consumer desktops and pro portables will get Merom as soon as it's released. In the meantime, they'll get speed bumped "quietly".
 

YS2003

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Dec 24, 2004
2,138
0
Finally I have arrived.....
With today's update on MBP (and price reduction), it seems we can expect rather frequent (comparing to Power PC era) and incremental upgrades or updates for upcoming Intel Macs. I think this is good to be a Mac customer (unless you bought a model which is updated a few days later).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.