Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you think we'll see a redesigned iMac this year for 2016?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 26.8%
  • No

    Votes: 41 73.2%

  • Total voters
    56
  • Poll closed .
Going old school with that heh. The old ADB keyboards. Given how wireless technology works, I don't think you can turn on a computer from a wireless device when its off, i.e., there's no power to interact with the computer when its completely powered down. I believe they did away with the powerswitch on the keyboard because USB didn't support such a mechanism as the ADB interface.

I didn't really think about that, but they at least could put the power button on the keyboard and still leave the one on the back.
 
Noo!!! Pleaseeeeeee let me enjoy this, just placed an order

4,0-GHz quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost tot 4,2 GHz
• 8 GB 1867-MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x 4 GB
• 512 GB flashopslag
• AMD Radeon R9 M395X met 4 GB videogeheugen
• Magic Mouse 2 + Magic Trackpad 2
 
Side note:

I found a mockup of colored iMacs.

https://www.behance.net/gallery/24342081/iMac-in-Space-Gray-Silver-Gold

Personally I think the Space Grey is little to dark, but other than that I would defiantly buy one.

Nice designed concepts but it doesn't have my favorite one that is pure white finish.
I think the problem with those colors on the current iMac body is that they distract too much from the screen cause they are very strong colors especially the space gray.
That's why I think white and the current aluminum body work best for this design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Icaras
I'm beginning to wonder if we'll see new iMacs at all. We're half way into October and nothing but rumors so far.
 
I doubt it.

If I were to design the iMac it would mostly stay the same with updated hardware except I would add an ultra wide to the line up.

Note: I havent given any thought into how it would work in relation to screen resolution but I'm sure we could figure it out. Hmm I would also make the Mac Mini as powerful or as near as powerful as the iMac then I could just get any display I wanted.
 
I doubt it.

If I were to design the iMac it would mostly stay the same with updated hardware except I would add an ultra wide to the line up.

Note: I havent given any thought into how it would work in relation to screen resolution but I'm sure we could figure it out. Hmm I would also make the Mac Mini as powerful or as near as powerful as the iMac then I could just get any display I wanted.

That's a nice idea which I would love to see but I don't think Apple would want to canabalise the all in one iMac with an equally powerful computer that can plug into any screen. One can dream though!

I would love to see a much larger iMac screen and one which can be used as dedicated screen as well.
 
Hmm I would also make the Mac Mini as powerful or as near as powerful as the iMac then I could just get any display I wanted.
I just got a refurb Mac Mini to bridge me from a failed iMac while I wait to see what's new. It's a terrific form factor. I can't understand why Apple doesn't develop the Mini properly and make the hard drive and RAM upgradeable. I guess I'm just a fringe element.
 
Just give me 34" ultra-wide curved 7k screen (6880x2880) with GTX 1080 grade graphics card, 1TB SSD standard, 4 USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports and a thermal design, that makes it completely silent under general work and doesn't throttle under heavy load, while still remaining quiet, and I'll be a happy camper.

Height adjust would be a nice bonus :)
 
Just give me 34" ultra-wide curved 7k screen (6880x2880) with GTX 1080 grade graphics card, 1TB SSD standard, 4 USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports and a thermal design, that makes it completely silent under general work and doesn't throttle under heavy load, while still remaining quiet, and I'll be a happy camper.
Don't forget whisper silent and all this for under 2,000 dollars :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: arefbe and Malus120
Just give me 34" ultra-wide curved 7k screen (6880x2880) with GTX 1080 grade graphics card, 1TB SSD standard, 4 USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports and a thermal design, that makes it completely silent under general work and doesn't throttle under heavy load, while still remaining quiet, and I'll be a happy camper.

Height adjust would be a nice bonus :)

Don't forget whisper silent and all this for under 2,000 dollars :eek:

$1999.99.
(With 6 core Skylake E and GTX 1080Ti BTO options :D )
 
  • Like
Reactions: maflynn
With 6 core Skylake E and GTX 1080Ti BTO options :D

Make that Kaby Lake, months before anyone else have it, and modern up-to-date opengl and/or metal drivers. Maybe even some exclusive software (3D modelling or even a game), presented at the keynote as "one more thing".

But can you imagine it? Apple once again being creme de la creme from technical and performance point of view?
 
Make that Kaby Lake, months before anyone else have it, and modern up-to-date opengl and/or metal drivers. Maybe even some exclusive software (3D modelling or even a game), presented at the keynote as "one more thing".

But can you imagine it? Apple once again being creme de la creme from technical and performance point of view?
Oh please don't get me started about "One More Thing." As much as I haven't lost faith in Apple like some people seem to have, Tim's Apple has forever tarnished Steve's once great saying when they abused it to literally troll their fans with a video at WWDC this year. For all the work Apple supposedly does keeping Steve's legacy alive inside the company it's hard to believe how bad most of their execs (and Tim himself) are at presenting. Ugh.

Getting back to the topic at hand, I certainly think there's certainly a chance Apple could get Kaby Lake, and possibly even Vega (pleeeeeaaaaaaasssssssseeeeee, pretty pleeeeaaaaasssseeee) a little early if we're (really) lucky.
 
I certainly think there's certainly a chance Apple could get Kaby Lake, and possibly even Vega (pleeeeeaaaaaaasssssssseeeeee, pretty pleeeeaaaaasssseeee) a little early
Honest question - why should Apple get a specific Kaby lake chip earlier then Lenovo, HP or Dell, when those folks are larger customers then Apple? If Intel was going to treat a given customer, wouldn't they consider their larger ones who give more money to Intel first?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
I just got a refurb Mac Mini to bridge me from a failed iMac while I wait to see what's new. It's a terrific form factor. I can't understand why Apple doesn't develop the Mini properly and make the hard drive and RAM upgradeable. I guess I'm just a fringe element.

What year is the mini you purchased? The latest generation minis are user upgradeable on RAM. Just unscrew the bottom plate and you have access to the RAM slots. Don't even need a screw driver.
 
Honest question - why should Apple get a specific Kaby lake chip earlier then Lenovo, HP or Dell, when those folks are larger customers then Apple? If Intel was going to treat a given customer, wouldn't they consider their larger ones who give more money to Intel first?
Now there's an argument for Apple to look into making ARM processors for desktop computers. Intel is not going to offer them anything special, and maybe Intel will be making decisions about future products based on their larger customers. How will Apple steal a march and get in front of the competition?
 
Honest question - why should Apple get a specific Kaby lake chip earlier then Lenovo, HP or Dell, when those folks are larger customers then Apple? If Intel was going to treat a given customer, wouldn't they consider their larger ones who give more money to Intel first?
Simply put, the Halo Effect. Having your new chips in Apple's latest products gets you in the (non tech) news, and builds brand and product awareness. Having your product in the latest Dell... not so much.

On top of that, Apple tends to build products at the higher end/cutting edge of the spectrum, which often creates great platforms to show off your latest tech.
Think
1. Core M and the Retina MacBook
2. LG displays and AMD chips in the 5K iMac
3. The MacBook Air and Intel's low powered chips
4. The original Retina MacBook Pro

Another factor that is relevant for AMD is that if you can build a good relationship with Apple and are willing to offer them lower prices and or work with them for early access to technology, Apple can be a very consistent and loyal customer.
 
Last edited:
I think they will redesign the iMac this year with reduced bezels.

I'd love a 34" size, but I suppose they'll keep the current ones. They might bring out a 30", as they used to offer a 30" Cinema Display. I do wish they would offer an integrated optical drive. DVDs are so much cheaper than iTunes, and I will be using them for decades to come, unless Apple introduces iTunes Match for video.
32" and 34" displays are becoming increasingly common on the PC side, as are edge-to-edge displays. My wife bought a 27" Acer Predator monitor for her PC, and the thing is utterly gorgeous, with no discernible bezel. That seems the logical step for the iMac, because then you could have a 32" screen in an enclosure not that much bigger than the current 27".
 
  • Like
Reactions: xgman and Malus120
Nice designed concepts but it doesn't have my favorite one that is pure white finish.
I think the problem with those colors on the current iMac body is that they distract too much from the screen cause they are very strong colors especially the space gray.
That's why I think white and the current aluminum body work best for this design.
I agree. I'm curious, what would Apple's lineup would look like if they used ceramic (like the new Apple Watch) in all of their products instead of aluminum? I would love to see a white ceramic iMac.
 
I would like to see the power button move from the back to the front. I'm sure Apple could make the power button blend into the front so it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb yet provide easier access to it.
Is it that difficult to rotate one's hand so as to reach a single finger one inch up from the bottom to located the easily distinguished button?

I'm being totally serious with the question. Do people really find the power button on the iMac difficult to locate without rotating the entire computer?

At first I hated the idea of ports and power button on the back, but I found that I rarely need to add/remove cables once they're plugged in, and I only power-down the iMac on major software updates or before a vacation, etc. The power button is easy to find, so I eventually found it to be a non-issue. But that's just me.
 
At first I hated the idea of ports and power button on the back, but I found that I rarely need to add/remove cables once they're plugged in, and I only power-down the iMac on major software updates or before a vacation, etc.
I don't mind the button but we do need to switch cables – we use the headphone cable to connect to an amplifier to play music in the entire house and we move the cable between two Macs. And when we use USB sticks, they need to be connected and disconnected. Due to USB being on the back I find myself scratching helplessly around until I find the slot. BUT – I can't imagine a Mac with slots in front or side, Jony would die first. So that's not going to happen.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.