Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TSE

macrumors 601
Original poster
Jun 25, 2007
4,035
3,559
St. Paul, Minnesota
I understand Apple's theory on not having MacOS be a touch user interface (those touchscreen Windows XP devices from years past). I also understand not turning iPadOS into some weird hybrid thingy that does a lot of things OK but nothing great (Windows 8).

But really, if an iPad is connected to an external monitor. Connected to a keyboard. Connected to a mouse. Why the hell should it still be running iPadOS? Isn't that choosing to run a touch interface with a mouse interface which mismatches the input with the interface - exactly what Apple is against?

Instead of trying to turn iPadOS's desktop experience into an ACCEPTABLE one which they have slowly been doing, just give us an already GREAT desktop experience and have the iPad run full MacOS when it meets certain requirements - it detects a keyboard, external monitor, and mouse are all connected. That way Apple can STILL control the experience, give us the absolute best of both worlds, and an M1 iPad Pro can still run the same apps in both ecosystems. When it is in tablet mode you have the best touch interface in the world, and when it is in desktop mode you have the best desktop interface in the world. No more confusing the two!
 

Jonr515

macrumors 6502
Nov 11, 2017
347
145
Midwest!
I think that would require a dual bootable OS based on peripherals. Besides taking up a lot of disk space that sounds like a technical nightmare although I wish it was possible. That being said I don’t think Apple wants to loose that much market when now if you want An m1 iPad and a m1 laptop/iMac/mini you have to buy two devices.
 

TSE

macrumors 601
Original poster
Jun 25, 2007
4,035
3,559
St. Paul, Minnesota
I think that would defeat the purpose and current direction of Apple and iPadOS. I don't think Apple is trying to turn the iPad into a Mac. I think Apple's goal is to make the iPadOS better for the purpose category it resides in.

But what category is a tablet that in which it is connected to a mouse and keyboard? Is it still a tablet if you aren't using the touch interface?
 

Seanm87

macrumors 68020
Oct 10, 2014
2,211
4,420
My iPad switching to MacOS every time i attach it to the magic keyboard (i take it on and off frequently) would be a tremendous pain in the ass.

So its a no from me.
 

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
But really, if an iPad is connected to an external monitor. Connected to a keyboard. Connected to a mouse. Why the hell should it still be running iPadOS? Isn't that choosing to run a touch interface with a mouse interface which mismatches the input with the interface - exactly what Apple is against?
So what happens to the stuff I’m working on in iPadOS? Just disappears on the assumption I want macOS?

This isnt the way to solve this ‘issue’. The only way is by adding features to ipadOS. I have a mac mini which I use via Jump or sidecar almost exclusively. MacOS as an app (as is nearly the case) works well. Extended functionality of sidecar would be a massive benefit. I think the only way macOS will ever be on an iPad is in a kind of app form like this
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko

symphony

macrumors 68020
Aug 25, 2016
2,232
2,641
But what category is a tablet that in which it is connected to a mouse and keyboard? Is it still a tablet if you aren't using the touch interface?
It’s still a tablet, the actual device is a tablet mounted on a keyboard. Without the keyboard, the tablet’s main input is still touch.

Apple just needs to build iPadOS as powerful as macOS
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko

maternidad

macrumors regular
Mar 18, 2021
240
336
This would be difficult to understand for people with qualities uncommon among those who read this website. iPadOS users already have beliefs about the means of producing outcomes with their device. macOS is very different. Imagine them opening System Preferences!

iPad apps, of course, do not become more pleasing to use with a trackpad and keyboard if started on macOS; even the benefit you describe I find probable to be more minimal than you think.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I think a docked laptop is a better option where as the iPad docked or not cannot compete. Plus I don’t think Apple will be merging the code lines or making a macOS lite for the iPad
 
  • Like
Reactions: raqball

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,655
4,490
We have been discussing this is another thread one month ago... Some people had suggested a Mac "app" from Apple, that would either disable the touchscreen or only work on an external display... (if that ever happens I think it would more likely be the second option)
Personally, I don't think this will happen anytime soon, but I can see a "desktop mode" when docked to a monitor, which would look like MacOS but just to make multitasking easier, not to install Mac-only apps.
Especially after following the Epic saga, I doubt Apple will ever want to have full MacOS on iPad...
Rather they will port their pro apps and will push developers to port their desktop apps to iPads... And many are doing it... Several software houses have announced they are working on iPad versions of their desktop apps.
So things are moving, but slowly.
 

Minerbot360

macrumors member
Apr 19, 2021
39
23
I agree with what was said in the Mac Address video, that the iPadOS mouse support was built for the magic keyboard, because Apple so strongly believes that moving your hand from the keyboard to touch a screen is awful. The mouse support was not added to make iPadOS more like macOS, it was added for the magic keyboard.
 

thefourthpope

macrumors 65816
Sep 8, 2007
1,439
848
DelMarVa
I agree with what was said in the Mac Address video, that the iPadOS mouse support was built for the magic keyboard, because Apple so strongly believes that moving your hand from the keyboard to touch a screen is awful. The mouse support was not added to make iPadOS more like macOS, it was added for the magic keyboard.

They were right about that and implemented it well. Lots of practice from their assistive options.

My iPad switching to MacOS every time i attach it to the magic keyboard (i take it on and off frequently) would be a tremendous pain in the ass.

So its a no from me.

Agreed. I move between removing and replacing the iPad in a single basic workflow like signing a PDF. At most there would need to be a keyboard command or app to launch (I don’t think either of those are coming).

I’m just looking for greatly improved multitasking (including true external monitor support) and making elements of the file system more available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Minerbot360

FrozenDarkness

macrumors 68000
Mar 21, 2009
1,832
1,124
it’s quite simple.

1) Apple wants to sell you two devices
2) The vast majority of people are buying iPads that are underpowered
3) Apple wants to sell you two devices

Apple wants to sell you two devices.
 

pdoherty

macrumors 65816
Dec 30, 2014
1,491
1,736
I think a docked laptop is a better option where as the iPad docked or not cannot compete. Plus I don’t think Apple will be merging the code lines or making a macOS lite for the iPad
Huh? The iPad Pros have identical hardware. And can have keyboards and mice attached. In what way can they not compete?
 

camotron

macrumors member
Mar 7, 2021
31
2
I think the middle ground is tighter integration between iPadOS and MacOS. This would benefit users and potentially allow some deeper use cases if done well. It also allows Apple to continue with their business plan of selling both units to a single user.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.