Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nylon

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 26, 2004
1,407
1,058
I'm planning on daisy-chaining a dvdrw and hard drive together since my MBP only has one firewire port.

Will burning disks be affected if I am simultaneously accessing the firewire HD or vice versa over the same firewire 400 bus.

I'm trying to avoid purchasing a hub.
 

7254278

macrumors 68020
Apr 11, 2004
2,365
0
NYC
I am not 100% sure but I would say yes simply because the firewire bus has a limited amount of bandwidth and it will be shared between the two devices.
 

Kingsly

macrumors 68040
I dont think daisy chaining is any different from a hub, bandwidth wise. I know DV takes up about 3.7 MB/s. I daisy chain my XL-1 with my storage drive and capture video to it all the time. Im only using 3.7x2 MB/s, or 7.4 of 400 MB/s. So no, as long as you dont use more bandwidth than FW can give, it wont affect performance. I think. :D
 

nylon

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 26, 2004
1,407
1,058
Well that offers two completely opposing views, not that I don't appreciate it. Anyone else care to chime in.
 

matticus008

macrumors 68040
Jan 16, 2005
3,330
1
Bay Area, CA
It depends on whether your hardware is good quality or not, but assuming the controllers are up to par, you will be able to use both devices seamlessly. If you had more than two devices attached, you would eventually run into performance problems...Firewire can fall apart completely if overloaded with requests for bandwidth, but a DVDRW and a hard drive won't max anything out.
 

mduser63

macrumors 68040
Nov 9, 2004
3,042
31
Salt Lake City, UT
Kingsly said:
I dont think daisy chaining is any different from a hub, bandwidth wise. I know DV takes up about 3.7 MB/s. I daisy chain my XL-1 with my storage drive and capture video to it all the time. Im only using 3.7x2 MB/s, or 7.4 of 400 MB/s. So no, as long as you dont use more bandwidth than FW can give, it wont affect performance. I think. :D

DV is actually around 25 Mbps (as opposed to MBps, which is 8 times more), still much less than Firewire supports.
 

steve_hill4

macrumors 68000
May 15, 2005
1,856
0
NG9, England
mduser63 said:
DV is actually around 25 Mbps (as opposed to MBps, which is 8 times more), still much less than Firewire supports.
25Mbps is 3.125MBps, (a Byte is 8 bits, not the other way around), so the initial figure of 3.7MBps is almost the same as the corrected figure you posted.

However, when you take into account error detection/correction and audio, it comes to 36Mbps. That equates to 4.5MBps.
 

howesey

macrumors 6502a
Dec 3, 2005
535
0
steve_hill4 said:
25Mbps is 3.125MBps, (a Byte is 8 bits, not the other way around), so the initial figure of 3.7MBps is almost the same as the corrected figure you posted.

However, when you take into account error detection/correction and audio, it comes to 36Mbps. That equates to 4.5MBps.
Is that 36MB/s or 36MiB/s?
 

mduser63

macrumors 68040
Nov 9, 2004
3,042
31
Salt Lake City, UT
steve_hill4 said:
25Mbps is 3.125MBps, (a Byte is 8 bits, not the other way around), so the initial figure of 3.7MBps is almost the same as the corrected figure you posted.

However, when you take into account error detection/correction and audio, it comes to 36Mbps. That equates to 4.5MBps.


Yes, but FireWire supports 400 Mbps, not 400 MBps like Kingsly posted.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.