Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iFanaddic

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 24, 2008
819
242
Montréal, Canada
Does siri use my internet connection when I'm asking it to set a timer, change songs, write a message to... ect.

I would assume siri only uses my data plan when I'm asking it to lookup stuff online and that commands can be done "on its own" right?
 

nathanlloyd

macrumors member
Dec 7, 2009
70
0
UK
Really hope this changes when it comes out of beta.

Driving home from work yesterday...
Me: "Play songs by xxx"
Siri: "I'm sorry, I can't seem to connect to the network"

It's ludicrous! Why does it need to connect to the network for tasks like that?!
:mad:
 

sammich

macrumors 601
Sep 26, 2006
4,305
268
Sarcasmville.
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2...-is-siri-on-an-iphone-4s-ars-investigates.ars

Siri connects to the web because, among other things, it allows the Siri team to see the requests coming through and continually adjust the way that Siri interprets the requests. Apple replaced the old Voice Control (which has the syntactical commands like 'Play song by <artist>") which didn't need network but it was really spotty in understanding you. You lose an occasionally working feature for something that works well, and, over time, gets better.
 

FSMBP

macrumors 68030
Jan 22, 2009
2,758
2,929
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2...-is-siri-on-an-iphone-4s-ars-investigates.ars

Siri connects to the web because, among other things, it allows the Siri team to see the requests coming through and continually adjust the way that Siri interprets the requests. Apple replaced the old Voice Control (which has the syntactical commands like 'Play song by <artist>") which didn't need network but it was really spotty in understanding you. You lose an occasionally working feature for something that works well, and, over time, gets better.

I dunno, I think Apple should let Voice Control work when you have no access to their Siri Server. At the end of the day, if I request to play songs by an artist, I would expect it to (as it did with my 3GS with Voice Control).
 

sammich

macrumors 601
Sep 26, 2006
4,305
268
Sarcasmville.
I dunno, I think Apple should let Voice Control work when you have no access to their Siri Server. At the end of the day, if I request to play songs by an artist, I would expect it to (as it did with my 3GS with Voice Control).

That's something that's very much against Apple's approach for consistency. If it started out as Siri, who can understand natural language, but then all of a sudden you had to contend with the plain Voice Control because of no network, it wouldn't understand because it requires commands to be spoken to a strict syntax. You wouldn't be familiar with this syntax because Siri has taught you otherwise. You'd probably end up more frustrated than before.
 

Blipp

macrumors 6502
Mar 14, 2011
268
0
I see both the users' and Apple's point of view on this. Both sides have valid arguments but it seems to me like there is a simple compromise available that would meet everyone's needs. If the the reason it wants a data connection even for tasks that don't require Siri to look beyond what's already on the phone is so they can track questions and answers I don't see why Siri couldn't cache these results and dump them to Apple once the phone has a connection.
 

nathanlloyd

macrumors member
Dec 7, 2009
70
0
UK
Siri connects to the web because, among other things, it allows the Siri team to see the requests coming through and continually adjust the way that Siri interprets the requests. Apple replaced the old Voice Control (which has the syntactical commands like 'Play song by <artist>") which didn't need network but it was really spotty in understanding you. You lose an occasionally working feature for something that works well, and, over time, gets better.

Totally agree with what you're saying here but I'm guessing Apple find it hard to see what you're requesting when there's no signal ;)
 

steveza

macrumors 68000
Feb 20, 2008
1,521
27
UK
I believe the voice processing technology relies on a large database of voice samples to do speech-to-text processing.

The phone is powerful enough to interpret a limited set of commands, "Listen to", "Call", etc, and then match what you say next with your music and contacts database. But to transcribe completely arbitrary text that it can't match with any known phrases requires a server. Android is the same way.

The real question is, why doesn't it fall back to local voice control when it doesn't have a connection? The 3GS and 4 have that feature so I can't imagine it would take much work to implement.
Voice control is there on the 4s just turn Siri off and it appears.
 

vitzr

macrumors 68030
Jul 28, 2011
2,765
3
California
The problem as I see it, with the entire "computing in the cloud strategy" is that no matter what company implements it, or provides the service, we are subject to our internet connection being always on and functional. The moment we are "offline" we are left with only what is resident on our devices.

It's for this very reason I have built a very comprehensive and robust home network. NAS for backup, and fiber for data flow. But in fairness this was very expensive and done when the house was being built last year. I have a vast amount of fiber, with wireline for backup / redundancy in virtually every wall in the house. Something like this is not possible, practically speaking, in an existing home.
 

Defender2010

Cancelled
Jun 6, 2010
3,131
1,097
The problem as I see it, with the entire "computing in the cloud strategy" is that no matter what company implements it, or provides the service, we are subject to our internet connection being always on and functional. The moment we are "offline" we are left with only what is resident on our devices.

It's for this very reason I have built a very comprehensive and robust home network. NAS for backup, and fiber for data flow. But in fairness this was very expensive and done when the house was being built last year. I have a vast amount of fiber, with wireline for backup / redundancy in virtually every wall in the house. Something like this is not possible, practically speaking, in an existing home.


don't see the relevance to this thread....just a boasting opportunity
 

BLee17

macrumors member
Jul 12, 2008
74
0
Sacramento, CA
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)

vitzr said:
The problem as I see it, with the entire "computing in the cloud strategy" is that no matter what company implements it, or provides the service, we are subject to our internet connection being always on and functional. The moment we are "offline" we are left with only what is resident on our devices.

It's for this very reason I have built a very comprehensive and robust home network. NAS for backup, and fiber for data flow. But in fairness this was very expensive and done when the house was being built last year. I have a vast amount of fiber, with wireline for backup / redundancy in virtually every wall in the house. Something like this is not possible, practically speaking, in an existing home.

Thanks for sharing.
 

thelatinist

macrumors 603
Aug 15, 2009
5,937
51
Connecticut, USA
I do think there should be a seamless way of moving between Siri and the native voice command system. Something like this:

Me: Siri, call my wife at work.
Siri: I am having trouble connecting to the network. Would you like to try your request on voice command?
Me: Yes.
iPhone: Beep beep.
Me: Call Jane Doe -- work.
iPhone: Calling Jane Doe -- work.
 

nini1026

macrumors newbie
Oct 29, 2011
26
0
That's something that's very much against Apple's approach for consistency. If it started out as Siri, who can understand natural language, but then all of a sudden you had to contend with the plain Voice Control because of no network, it wouldn't understand because it requires commands to be spoken to a strict syntax. You wouldn't be familiar with this syntax because Siri has taught you otherwise. You'd probably end up more frustrated than before.

Thanks for your sharing. It reads quite interesting and seems to make sense.:)
 

Small White Car

macrumors G4
Aug 29, 2006
10,972
1,468
Washington DC
I do think there should be a seamless way of moving between Siri and the native voice command system. Something like this:

Me: Siri, call my wife at work.
Siri: I am having trouble connecting to the network. Would you like to try your request on voice command?
Me: Yes.
iPhone: Beep beep.
Me: Call Jane Doe -- work.
iPhone: Calling Jane Doe -- work.

Yes, there definitely needs to be a "little siri" in the phone as a backup.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.