Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

theorist9

macrumors 68040
Original poster
May 28, 2015
3,845
3,033
In prior MBP models, the larger SSD's were sometimes faster. For instance, in the 2014 MBP, the 128 GB – 512 GB SSD's were slower than the 1 TB SSD, because the former used PCIe 2.0 × 2 (8 Gbit/s), while the latter used PCIe 2.0 × 4 (16 Gbit/s).

I'm thus wondering if there are notable speed bumps in going to larger SSD sizes in the new AS MBP's and, if so, where they are (and what underlies them, e.g., difference in number of lanes, etc.).

EDIT:

I found this thread:


Looks like write speed increases for every increment between 512 GB and 4 TB, but that 4 TB and 8 TB are about the same. With read speed the trend is not as clear. No one has provided an explanation yet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yurkennis

OSX15

macrumors regular
Jun 2, 2014
148
47
Cyberspace
There is already a substantial speed increase from going 512GB -> 1TB, but more importantly, larger disk sizes wil
have better longevity, since they have a higher TBW rating. All information I’ve seen thus far leads me to believe that the sweet spot is 2TB for speed and longevity. I myself chose 1TB.
 

newellj

macrumors G3
Oct 15, 2014
8,153
3,046
East of Eden
I can't cite a specific source, but I'm pretty sure I've seen data that shows an increase going from 512GB to 1TB. Whether there's a further bump from 1TB to 2TB, I don't know. The smallest iPhone 13 Pro, 256GB, is noticeably slower than the 512GB version, IIRC.
 

jdb8167

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2008
4,854
4,594
I can't cite a specific source, but I'm pretty sure I've seen data that shows an increase going from 512GB to 1TB. Whether there's a further bump from 1TB to 2TB, I don't know. The smallest iPhone 13 Pro, 256GB, is noticeably slower than the 512GB version, IIRC.
I’ve seen video and images of M1 Pro and Max MacBook Pros with the bottom cover removed that show empty pads for the SSD on 512 GB and 1 TB models. That would imply that more than 1 TB is needed to get a fully populated motherboard. Given the way that SSDs work, I would assume that having double the SSD chips would improve performance.

It should be easy enough to test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theorist9

Ploki

macrumors 601
Jan 21, 2008
4,324
1,560
The speed tests i've seen from 1 to 2TB never hit the 7.4GB/s of the 8TB apple tested drive, so i guess the 5300mb/s to 7400mb/s bump comes from going to 8TB drive.
 

MK500

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2009
434
550
Quick test on 14" Max with 1TB:
Screen Shot 2021-11-06 at 3.08.07 PM.png
 

hstanyan

macrumors newbie
Dec 11, 2020
10
4
Some relevant benchmark data in another thread:

 

jdb8167

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2008
4,854
4,594
Some relevant benchmark data in another thread:

Nothing above 1 TB in that thread unfortunately.
 

theorist9

macrumors 68040
Original poster
May 28, 2015
3,845
3,033
I found this thread:


Looks like write speed increases for every increment between 512 GB and 4 TB, but that 4 TB and 8 TB are about the same. With read speed the trend is not as clear. No one has provided an explanation yet. [Also added this info. to the top post.]
 
Last edited:

theorist9

macrumors 68040
Original poster
May 28, 2015
3,845
3,033
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.