Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iHorseHead

macrumors 68000
Original poster
Jan 1, 2021
1,594
2,003
It's clearly not enough. SomeOrdinaryGamer on YouTube shows you how to make a more powerful Mac out of your PC that Apple doesn't even sell.
When you open 69000 tabs on Chrome and Windows Server on virtual machine it crashes!! 16GB is clearly not enough.
 

MBAir2010

macrumors 604
May 30, 2018
6,975
6,354
there
Wait

wasn't the 8 GB of RAM M1 we are forbiden to purchase
in a post here just Last week?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery

5425642

Cancelled
Jan 19, 2019
983
554
I’m a developer and I’m only hitting yellow sometimes in the memory pressure so I’m wodering what you do to hit it with 16GB?
 

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,390
30,060
SoCal
It's clearly not enough. SomeOrdinaryGamer on YouTube shows you how to make a more powerful Mac out of your PC that Apple doesn't even sell.
When you open 69000 tabs on Chrome and Windows Server on virtual machine it crashes!! 16GB is clearly not enough.
This is as utterly useless of a post just like the one saying don’t buy 8GB
 

pshufd

macrumors G4
Oct 24, 2013
10,150
14,574
New Hampshire
I'm running 24 GB of RAM in my macOS Virtual Machine. Runs just fine. It's using 5 GB for applications and 7 GB for cache. My M1 mini is using 12 GB for programs and 4 GB for cache with about 80 MB of SWAP. I'd love to add a 32 GB mini to my setup. My Windows desktop has 128 GB of RAM so I can go higher if needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hobowankenobi

AppleFanatic10

macrumors 68030
Nov 2, 2010
2,833
326
Hawthorne, CA
It's clearly not enough. SomeOrdinaryGamer on YouTube shows you how to make a more powerful Mac out of your PC that Apple doesn't even sell.
When you open 69000 tabs on Chrome and Windows Server on virtual machine it crashes!! 16GB is clearly not enough.
Why would you even open 69k tabs?
 

cbascue

macrumors newbie
Dec 1, 2021
5
5
Just an interesting note: When I did the trade in calculation on the Apple store site, they valued my 16gb Macbook Pro 2020 the same as the 8gb version 2020
 

cbascue

macrumors newbie
Dec 1, 2021
5
5
It appears Apple values the 2020 16gb and 8gb as the same value, so if you trade every couple years the 16gb will be fine for most users and Apple is not considering ram during trade in process. Future proof with computers is impossible.
 

5425642

Cancelled
Jan 19, 2019
983
554
Don’t get this thread, I have 16gb MacBook Pro 14” with multi softwares running and my compress is 24-39% and I have 4-5gb free ram.

Then I’m running vscode, Xcode etc.
So please explain for me why I should not buy the 16gb?
And I’ll replace this with a new one 2024.
I’m sure I’ll manage by with 16 until then.

It’s stupid to buy 32 when you don’t use it.
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,366
10,127
Atlanta, GA
It appears Apple values the 2020 16gb and 8gb as the same value, so if you trade every couple years the 16gb will be fine for most users and Apple is not considering ram during trade in process. Future proof with computers is impossible.
Back in 2014 I upgraded to 16GB in my MBP. Everything I use now is more demanding of RAM from apps to webpages. So getting the extra RAM future-proofed my computer.

However, if future proofing to you only means trade-in value, then you're probably correct.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jagooch
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.