Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Downside to formatting drives as Exfat?
- Thread starter bellbound
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I doubt you'll see any real negatives in terms of performance. ExFAT is the necessary format if you want to transfer files from Mac to Windows and vice versa. Windows can't read/write APFS or HFS+, and MacOS can't write to NTFS. FAT32 is your only other option, but it has file size limitations.
What about car manufactures (usb keys u attach to listen on the go)... do they support exFAT? That could be the other reason
i've never really used or needed exFat, because i'd rather separate drives, vs same drive for everything.
You probably want to test it to see. exFAT has been around since 2006, so it's not exactly a new file format. Chances are you will have support on any modern OS, including cars and cameras.
This is my standard reply when this subject comes up.
If you have Mac files that are important to you, keep them on a MAC-FORMATTED drive (HFS+ with journaling enabled).
DO NOT "trust" your important Mac stuff to drives that ARE NOT Mac format.
If you need to exchange files between a Mac and a PC, use a cross-formatted drive that is specifically dedicated for this purpose. Usually a USB3 flash drive of sufficient capacity will do the job.
But again, DON'T keep important Mac files on a "cross-formatted" drive.
If you have Mac files that are important to you, keep them on a MAC-FORMATTED drive (HFS+ with journaling enabled).
DO NOT "trust" your important Mac stuff to drives that ARE NOT Mac format.
If you need to exchange files between a Mac and a PC, use a cross-formatted drive that is specifically dedicated for this purpose. Usually a USB3 flash drive of sufficient capacity will do the job.
But again, DON'T keep important Mac files on a "cross-formatted" drive.
Just curious, why you would suggest that? It’s not like the other formats are new or have issues with data loss/failure. I can see why with Mac-exclusive content, but there are times when it would be advantageous to have content accessible to other operating systems.
"Just curious, why you would suggest that?"
I've seen a number of posts in this forum over time from users who used cross-formatted drives.
Usually what happens is that the user connects the drive to a PC, then "does something" (although exactly what was done is a matter of uncertainty), and then takes the drive back to the Mac, and..... all the Mac files that were previously there, are now gone. Gone... as in "POOF"!
Just like that.
I've seen a number of posts in this forum over time from users who used cross-formatted drives.
Usually what happens is that the user connects the drive to a PC, then "does something" (although exactly what was done is a matter of uncertainty), and then takes the drive back to the Mac, and..... all the Mac files that were previously there, are now gone. Gone... as in "POOF"!
Just like that.
Last edited:
FAT32 has 4 Gig file-size limitation, so i reckon its ok. I don't think any cross platform keeping importance, is better than anything else out there...
This would basically also exclude NAS then, since NAS is formatted as EXT4.