Well, truthfully, not literally dumpster diving as it was garbage on the side of the road. A Kijiji seller picked up this machine and put up an ad for it for one hundred bux Canadian (~US$76 or ~€64), so I went to check it out. There was no OS on it, but it did have the boot up chime. With my Lion external hard drive plugged in, it did also give me the grey Apple so that was encouraging, but then booted to a distorted screen and then kernel panicked. Nonetheless I bought it anyway.
Took it home, and removed the surprisingly large Quadro FX 4500 and replaced it with my 7300 GT.
Success! Booted up to Lion fine. Confirmed it was a 2 x 3.0 GHz Xeon X5365 quad-core, for a total of 8 cores, with RAM with proper Apple-approved heatsinks. However,the DIMM riser error lights were on. It turns out there was some bad RAM, but that still left me with 12 GB. I added a bit more of RAM I already had, as I was in the process of upgrading a 2 x 2.66 GHz Xeon 5150 dual-core, to bring me to 16 GB RAM. I transferred over the Radeon HD 5770 from that other machine, along with my El Capitan SSD and my Windows 10 SSD. It already had WiFi, and I moved the Bluetooth module over from that other machine. It all works great! I'm typing this post on it right now.
To my pleasant surprise, I didn't have to re-activate Windows. Despite the fact it's a completely different machine, it stayed activated. I guess the hardware is close enough. However, sleep mode has gone wonky for some reason. Before it would sleep fine, but now upon waking, the machine is slow as molasses, as it takes minutes to wake up completely. Hibernation is off, and I've turned the processor settings to maximum to no avail, so for the time being I've deactivated sleep completely in Windows. Oh well. It sleeps perfectly in El Capitan, so it's appears to be a software thing.
Also, to my pleasant surprise, the machine is very quiet. At boot up, the fans stay at minimum speed, despite the much higher TDP at 120 W, vs. the other machine's 65 W Xeon 5150. I had ordered the 80 W E5345 G0 for that other machine, but had I known, I would have ordered the 120 W X5355 G0 instead. However, at this point I don't know if I'll even bother installing the E5345 in that other machine since I won't be using it, now that I have this X5365 G0 machine.
Do I notice much difference with 8 cores vs 4 cores? Actually, for basic OS navigation and surfing, the 4-core machine was pretty decent, although with the new machine some things are smoother when it comes to multitasking. One big difference though is now I can play 1080p60 VP9 in Chrome perfectly. It was a problem on the 4-core machine. 1440p60 remains a no-go though.
In Cinebench R20, you can see that the X5365 is well over twice as fast as the 5150.
Since Geekbench 5 isn't supported on El Capitan, I had to run it Windows 10.
Multi-core performance is roughly the same as my 2017 iPad Pro 10.5" with A10X SoC.
Is the Quadro just junk now? Or can I bake it or something to try to revive it?
Took it home, and removed the surprisingly large Quadro FX 4500 and replaced it with my 7300 GT.
Success! Booted up to Lion fine. Confirmed it was a 2 x 3.0 GHz Xeon X5365 quad-core, for a total of 8 cores, with RAM with proper Apple-approved heatsinks. However,the DIMM riser error lights were on. It turns out there was some bad RAM, but that still left me with 12 GB. I added a bit more of RAM I already had, as I was in the process of upgrading a 2 x 2.66 GHz Xeon 5150 dual-core, to bring me to 16 GB RAM. I transferred over the Radeon HD 5770 from that other machine, along with my El Capitan SSD and my Windows 10 SSD. It already had WiFi, and I moved the Bluetooth module over from that other machine. It all works great! I'm typing this post on it right now.
To my pleasant surprise, I didn't have to re-activate Windows. Despite the fact it's a completely different machine, it stayed activated. I guess the hardware is close enough. However, sleep mode has gone wonky for some reason. Before it would sleep fine, but now upon waking, the machine is slow as molasses, as it takes minutes to wake up completely. Hibernation is off, and I've turned the processor settings to maximum to no avail, so for the time being I've deactivated sleep completely in Windows. Oh well. It sleeps perfectly in El Capitan, so it's appears to be a software thing.
Also, to my pleasant surprise, the machine is very quiet. At boot up, the fans stay at minimum speed, despite the much higher TDP at 120 W, vs. the other machine's 65 W Xeon 5150. I had ordered the 80 W E5345 G0 for that other machine, but had I known, I would have ordered the 120 W X5355 G0 instead. However, at this point I don't know if I'll even bother installing the E5345 in that other machine since I won't be using it, now that I have this X5365 G0 machine.
Do I notice much difference with 8 cores vs 4 cores? Actually, for basic OS navigation and surfing, the 4-core machine was pretty decent, although with the new machine some things are smoother when it comes to multitasking. One big difference though is now I can play 1080p60 VP9 in Chrome perfectly. It was a problem on the 4-core machine. 1440p60 remains a no-go though.
In Cinebench R20, you can see that the X5365 is well over twice as fast as the 5150.
Since Geekbench 5 isn't supported on El Capitan, I had to run it Windows 10.
Multi-core performance is roughly the same as my 2017 iPad Pro 10.5" with A10X SoC.
Is the Quadro just junk now? Or can I bake it or something to try to revive it?
Last edited: