Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Early 2008 mac pro
- Thread starter Louis100
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You'll find two sticky posts:
Mac Pro CPU Compatibility List - if you have a dual quad core 3.2 GHz CPU, then there's no upgrade.
GPU Compatibility List for cMP - GPU choice is only limited by power and OS. You can add more power and use patched installer to load the latest OS (Catalina 10.15.4). Max Nvidia card is 1080 Ti (max OS for that is High Sierra). Max AMD card is Radeon VII. The list hasn't been updated to include AMD Navi cards (requires Catalina 10.15.2). Modern AMD cards require SSE4.2 emulator - there's a new beta that is being tested for Catalina 10.15.4.
Last edited by a moderator:
The Dual quad core 3.2 is not much faster than the dual quad 2.8.
I went for the GTX 680 and 64gig Ram
3 SSD and a spinner.
3.1 also doesn't have the special trails some big spinners need.
One is a Samsung blade It only gets 700 sec ( if I remove some ram ).
And El Capitan.
If you van find a cheap 2010 It doesn't have the PCI bottleneck problems.
The 6 core is much faster.
I went for the GTX 680 and 64gig Ram
3 SSD and a spinner.
3.1 also doesn't have the special trails some big spinners need.
One is a Samsung blade It only gets 700 sec ( if I remove some ram ).
And El Capitan.
If you van find a cheap 2010 It doesn't have the PCI bottleneck problems.
The 6 core is much faster.
I really started updating my mine (2 x 2.8) about a year ago and did a Geekbench test at the time as a baseline:
Benchmarking today (2 x 3.2), I get:
Basically about 6.3% more on Single Core and 9.2% on Multi Core. Not a huge jump.
I've had to pull two failed RAM sticks and this probably had some impact. Will test again when these are replaced.
I had already upgraded my GPU from a HD 5770 to a Titan X last year when I took the baseline:
Benchmarking today (RX580) I get:
27.5% higher. Note that the RX580 results reflects hardware acceleration via OpenCore and the RadeonBoost Kext.
Where I would have been (roughly) with my old HD5770:
What I have found is that the CPU scores are really low compared to modern units. 2018 MacMini kills it for instance:
On the other hand, being able to use modern GPU's swings things the other way with those by order of magnitude:
The GPU numbers are on par with modern units in general.
Benchmarking today (2 x 3.2), I get:
Basically about 6.3% more on Single Core and 9.2% on Multi Core. Not a huge jump.
I've had to pull two failed RAM sticks and this probably had some impact. Will test again when these are replaced.
I had already upgraded my GPU from a HD 5770 to a Titan X last year when I took the baseline:
Benchmarking today (RX580) I get:
27.5% higher. Note that the RX580 results reflects hardware acceleration via OpenCore and the RadeonBoost Kext.
Where I would have been (roughly) with my old HD5770:
What I have found is that the CPU scores are really low compared to modern units. 2018 MacMini kills it for instance:
On the other hand, being able to use modern GPU's swings things the other way with those by order of magnitude:
The GPU numbers are on par with modern units in general.
Hi
That's brilliant info, the gpu makes a big difference
Is there a big difference between the
8BG Sapphire Radeon RX 580 NITRO+ 1411MHz GPU 8000MHz GDDR5 2xDP 2xHDMI DVI-D and the
Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX 590 GME 8GB GDDR5 Dual Graphics card RX590 8G.
Cheers
That's brilliant info, the gpu makes a big difference
Is there a big difference between the
8BG Sapphire Radeon RX 580 NITRO+ 1411MHz GPU 8000MHz GDDR5 2xDP 2xHDMI DVI-D and the
Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX 590 GME 8GB GDDR5 Dual Graphics card RX590 8G.
Cheers
Also only the RX580 pulse allows you to retain usage of slot 2 ... the Nitro variants do not, I'm not aware of any 590 that doesn't block slot 2.
Yes, USB 3.0 PCIe card would be great to upgrade to. You can do some reading on this WIKI post on USB 3.
USB 3.x PCIe Cards for Classic Mac Pro
Thread summary for latest recommendations. This thread refers to PCIe cards for adding USB 3.0 and 3.1 to classic Mac Pros. General Notes: The USB 3.0 cards in this list support UASP for faster transfer speeds and reduced CPU utilization (exceptions to this are noted). The USB 3.0 cards in...
forums.macrumors.com
Yes, USB 3.0 PCIe card would be great to upgrade to. You can do some reading on this WIKI post on USB 3.
USB 3.x PCIe Cards for Classic Mac Pro
Thread summary for latest recommendations. This thread refers to PCIe cards for adding USB 3.0 and 3.1 to classic Mac Pros. General Notes: The USB 3.0 cards in this list support UASP for faster transfer speeds and reduced CPU utilization (exceptions to this are noted). The USB 3.0 cards in...
Excellent info
Much appreciated ??
You’re Welcome. I’m using various brands of USB 3.0 PCIe cards like Sonnet Allegro Pro, Sonnet Allegro non-Pro model, Caldigit Fasta-6gu3 6g eSATA & usb 3.0 , Highpoint Rocketu 1144CM, Inateck. They all worked fine. If you’re getting a Caldigit card, just take note that the first gen model released in 2014 will only work up to OS Mavericks. This model won’t work in Yosemite and newer OS versions. The newer Caldigit card works from Mountain Lion to the latest OS
Sonnet Allegro Pro USB 3.0 Comes with the White Heatsink in the middle section
Sonnet Allegro Non-Pro Model
Caldigit 2ND Gen Model - Works from Mountain Lion to Mojave
I have an External HD with an eSATA Port, I got a cable adapter that connects the eSATA port to the USB 3.0 port of the PCIe card
