Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Early 2011 MBP: hardware upgrade worth it?

N

Naudin

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 11, 2016
3
0
Hi all,

I own an early 2011, 17 inch MacBook Pro with stock hardware (2.2 GHz i7, 4 GB RAM and standard hard disk). Since lately it has been getting really slow, I'm thinking of doing a hardware upgrade. More specifically I'm thinking of replacing my hard disk with a Samsung 850 EVO SSD (500 GB) and upping my RAM to 16 GB (1600 MHz Corsair Vengeance). However, since my MBP is already quite old, I'm not sure whether I should make this investment (around €250 total). I read on some blog that if you're MacBook is more than 4 years old and too slow, it is wiser to just buy a new one. However, I see lots of people still upgrading 2011 MacBooks. There are several objections I could think of; considering the age of the MB, other parts will likely start to fail in the near future, rendering my investment useless. Also, the processor can become the bottleneck so that it does not increase performance to current standards and furthermore, Apple can stop supporting older MacBooks like mine with new OS X versions to come. I've seen this MacBook being sold for quite high prices still (€850-1000), which I'm also taking into consideration. Anyone care to give some advice?

Thanks!

Naudin
 
If your 2011 MBP has the AMD Radeon HD 6750M dGPU then it is a ticking time bomb and I would not put any money into it. I would put the upgrade money towards a newer Mac.
 
I have a 2011 15" 2GHz i7 MBP. I have put 8GB RAM in it, and a 480GB Crucial SSD. It absolutely flies. I'm still using it for moderate sized Pro Tools recording sessions. As long as it keeps working, I can see it being really fast for another couple years still. SSD drives are pretty cheap now, and make a huge difference in performance. If your computer dies, just pull the SSD drive and re-use it with your next computer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonsi
I upgraded my RAM to 8GB, and it was a marginal improvement, and then added a Samsung 1TB SSD and that was a major performance boost.

I also added an ExpressCard with two USB-3 ports.

I use GFxCardStatus to keep it on the integrated graphics card just not to tempt fate with the Radeon.

My 2011 will be with me for a lot longer.
 
Thanks for the input everyone. I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000, so I suppose I won't have to worry about that?
 
Naudin said:
Thanks for the input everyone. I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000, so I suppose I won't have to worry about that?
Click to expand...
In that case, then I did add a SSD and more RAM to my 2011 MBP and it was a big improvement. I did the RAM first and there was no big noticeable change except the memory was not as close to having to swap to disk. Later I installed the SSD and it made a BIG improvement.
 
Naudin said:
Thanks for the input everyone. I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000, so I suppose I won't have to worry about that?
Click to expand...

That's correct. You'll get a new life out of your machine with an SSD; 1TB drives are even affordable now (I have a Crucial M550 1TB in mine). RAM depends more on what you do with your machine, if you run Adobe CC or other apps that suck up as much RAM as possible, then 16GB is a no brainer — but if you're a lighter user than 8GB is adequate for most tasks. SSD makes everything faster either way.
 
Is the early 2011 SATA-3 ?

If not the performance will be improved considerably with an SSD, but no where near SATA-3 speeds.

If I find myself using Parallels more often, I'll look at going from 8GB to 16GB RAM.
 
Naudin said:
I have an Intel HD Graphics 3000, so I suppose I won't have to worry about that?
Click to expand...

Are you sure? Where did you look?

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 04.59.19.png

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 04.59.44.png

@CoastalOR
Is the 6770M also a "ticking time bomb"?
 
I'd skip the fast RAM and just get typical 16gb, but go for at least 8gb so that you don't swap as much. The SSD is where you'll see all of the difference really.
 
Erdbeertorte said:
Are you sure? Where did you look?
Click to expand...

You're right, I also have the 6750M built in. That's bad news, I suppose? So far I haven't had any problems with my graphics card. CoastalOR, do you really think the chances of failure are that large?
 
Naudin said:
You're right, I also have the 6750M built in. That's bad news, I suppose? So far I haven't had any problems with my graphics card. CoastalOR, do you really think the chances of failure are that large?
Click to expand...
They seem to be pretty much inevitable eventuallly if something else doesn't fail first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back