Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gr8pics

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 20, 2008
173
4
Is it possible to get a egpu setup that will outperform the Vega 56, or arent we there yet?
 
Is it possible to get a egpu setup that will outperform the Vega 56, or arent we there yet?
I don't have the Vega56 internal card but I have a Vega64 internal card and a couple eGPU's.

The Vega64 internal outperforms:
my Vega56 eGPU
my Vega64 watercooled eGPU
my Radeon 7 eGPU.

I don't have any of the current 5600-5700 cards to try but I would doubt they would be far ahead if at all over even the Radeon 7.

This is just based on some benchmarking software tests.
On Geekbench, the Vega48 in my other machines is almost completely even with the Vega56/64 eGPU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sooby
If it's helpful for comparison, reports and benchmark scores using a "loaded" MBP16,1 with RX 5700 XT in eGPU are here:
 
Is it possible to get a egpu setup that will outperform the Vega 56, or arent we there yet?

Depends on work load compute vs games vs render etc.

I would say the Radeon 5700XT would be ahead of the Vega 56. Probably better thermals too. £350. If you already have the Vega 56, I'd wait until AMD 'FINALLY' release the RDNA 2 later this year Oct-Dec'.

If you're coming from a 580, you'll notice. But at over twice the cost does it perform twice as fast as the 580 in all situations? In some, maybe, on others, not as much. If from a Vega 56...you'll probably notice...but not by as much. You're buying seconds.

The uber fish Radeon 6900XT and 6800XT and various 4k gaming disruptors are pending. And it will probably be the equivalent of the NV flagship and then some. Blow the doors off. These will cost? $999 and $699 and probably a 6700XT variant for $399-499 which will have knock on pricing pressure for the 5700XT which is probably a low end card masquerading as a middle range card if we're being honest.

You'll get far more bang for your buck.

Azrael.
 
Is it possible to get a egpu setup that will outperform the Vega 56, or arent we there yet?
Thunderbolt 3 could be bottleneck here - never as fast as PCIE. It's about 20-30% performance drop comparing to internal GPU.
 
Thunderbolt 3 could be bottleneck here - never as fast as PCIE. It's about 20-30% performance drop comparing to internal GPU.

Internal is best (no jokes...)

And the performance drop can vary according to task. 10%-30%, sure. Again. Upon task.

As for PCIE. Be nice when Apple gets all their Macs on PCIE Express 4...

And if Intel updates Thunderbolt 3/4 to 5 with an actual bandwidth/performance boost.

And if Apple optimises their apps for eGPU further.

What's the original poster's spec? (Duh. I noticed thread title...iMac Pro base model.)

I'd wait until the end of the year for AMD's next gpu. 'Big Navi.'

Then you'll definitely notice the eGPU boost over the Vega 56. It's a decent card or was. But it's old now.

AMD/Mac have been hanging onto the Polaris 580s, Vega 56/64s for a while now. The Radeon VII stop gap. We've only just got the 5700XT which has been out ages.

If you want to pick up a cheap eGPU chass' plus another Vega 56 or Radeon 5700XT you'll get a boost on a rendering workload for something like Blender 3D. Sometimes it's less sometimes it's more dramatic. Again. Depending on task. Price for this could vary from £400-600. Depending on Chassis Sonnet/Razor vs Vega 56/5700XT.)

To be fair. It's hardly cutting edge.

Big Navi can't come soon enough. And then Apple will prob' only offer it on the Mac Pro for kidney prices.

So the only option will be to eGPU it.

Azrael.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.