Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

fuccboi

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 19, 2015
4
1
The only thing that really impressed me is Adobe Flash performance. Some sites still use it for video content and there is a noticeable improvement in performance. Other than that, it's not really that good as I anticipated reading the positive reviews here. Yes, I understand that this is not the final version but still. It's an improvement over Yosemite but just because Yosemite was that bad. Basically, it's how the Yosemite was supposed to be I guess.

Preview and PDF:
Instead of lagging on scrolling trying to process all the stuff it just does it in the background and shows a blank page first. This is how it should have been from the start.

Split view:
I thought it would be like it is in Windows, just drag the window to the left/right, but it's done in a very counterintuitive way (I had to use Google).
 

nikmatt

macrumors newbie
Apr 14, 2013
15
6
Orlando, FL
Everything is fine aside from it breaking Safari. Tab processes freeze like three seconds after a page finishes loading. It does this every time so I've had to begrudgingly move back to Chrome's bloated shenanigans.
 

patternjake

macrumors member
Sep 17, 2015
87
14
Everything is fine aside from it breaking Safari. Tab processes freeze like three seconds after a page finishes loading. It does this every time so I've had to begrudgingly move back to Chrome's bloated shenanigans.
Safari for me works better in El Cap than it ever did in Yosemite. Nothing will get me to change from this wonderful browser.
Edge as far as I'm concerned can jump off the EDGE of a cliff, it sucks.
 

xmichaelp

macrumors 68000
Jul 10, 2012
1,815
626
The second thing you listed isn't even a bug. What are your actual gripes? It's only meant to be a small upgrade on the surface. The bigger changes happen in performance and smoothness. Is it not faster than Yosemite for you?

Either way.. I'm glad the window snapping is the way it is. It's annoying in Windows when you want to move a window and it prompts you to snap it. I rarely want to snap a window, let me activate it myself if I want to.
 

fuccboi

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Sep 19, 2015
4
1
The bigger changes happen in performance and smoothness. Is it not faster than Yosemite for you?

My point is it's only faster because of Yosemite. Yosemite shouldn't have existed at all IMO. The new features aren't as good as I expected but I'd still give it a solid 4/5 though. Good release.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lolito

aohus

macrumors 68000
Apr 4, 2010
1,903
536
sky
should i wait for the final version? or is the GM released on 9/11 going to be the final build?
 

Lolito

macrumors 6502
Mar 20, 2013
397
34
here
So there is people who use Safari???? Seriously?

I bet there might be people who uses maps, notes, reminders and mail... My godness!!!
 

chabig

macrumors G4
Sep 6, 2002
11,449
9,321
I thought it would be like it is in Windows, just drag the window to the left/right, but it's done in a very counterintuitive way (I had to use Google).
Dragging to the side moves windows to the adjacent space.
 

aohus

macrumors 68000
Apr 4, 2010
1,903
536
sky
So there is people who use Safari???? Seriously?

I bet there might be people who uses maps, notes, reminders and mail... My godness!!!


um yeah? chrome uses ridiculous amount of power. i refuse to use chrome. firefox no thanks.

and from what i recall you can't use gestures to go forward and back.
 

Eithanius

macrumors 68000
Nov 19, 2005
1,556
419
um yeah? chrome uses ridiculous amount of power. i refuse to use chrome. firefox no thanks.

and from what i recall you can't use gestures to go forward and back.

I've ditched Apple's default gestures and used my custom gestures on BetterTouchTool... Works on any browsers and apps...
 

Lolito

macrumors 6502
Mar 20, 2013
397
34
here
I've ditched Apple's default gestures and used my custom gestures on BetterTouchTool... Works on any browsers and apps...

same here. but indeed safari runs lighter than firefox and chrome. But i use so many add-ons on both that i use safari just to be free of cookies when buying flights and that stuff, or for a third account auto login.
 

dugbug

macrumors 68000
Aug 23, 2008
1,929
2,147
Somewhere in Florida
Everything is fine aside from it breaking Safari. Tab processes freeze like three seconds after a page finishes loading. It does this every time so I've had to begrudgingly move back to Chrome's bloated shenanigans.

thats not right at all... you may want to disable any active extensions, clear safari data.
 

\-V-/

Suspended
May 3, 2012
3,153
2,688
I don't like how it creates a virtual desktop for split view. It means when you come out of split view you have to get rid of the virtual desktop just to see both apps normally again.
Yes, I find that very irritating ... but the quickest way to do split view is to have the windows you want open ... then click and hold the green button on one of the windows. It'll enter split view. Then click on the other window that you want split. Now you can adjust them in the middle. I wanted it to be more like Windows as well ... but it's some weird, full screen, virtual desktop thing. I'm still glad it's there ... just not a fan of the implementation of it.
 

patternjake

macrumors member
Sep 17, 2015
87
14
um yeah? chrome uses ridiculous amount of power. i refuse to use chrome. firefox no thanks.

and from what i recall you can't use gestures to go forward and back.
I love the gestures in safari with my Magic Mouse, and scrolling has that lovely inertia 'bounce' effect. Chrome hasn't.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.