Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

east85

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 24, 2010
1,343
495
I enabled Trim via Terminal on 10.10.4 and experienced excessive beachballing on my Crucial M4 SSD. My MacBook model is in my signature. This was pretty odd. Anyways, I eventually disabled native Trim via Terminal and re-installed the third party TrimEnabler application. I had disabled TrimEnabler and uninstalled prior to enabling Trim natively with Terminal, so everything should have been "clean" so to speak.

For whatever reason TrimEnabler works fine and I get no beachballing, while Terminal Trim that has been natively put into 10.10.4 has been a nightmare.

I'm just wondering if anyone might have any ideas as to why this is, or if anyone has had a similar experience.
 

Gav2k

macrumors G3
Jul 24, 2009
9,216
1,608
Not all models are currently supported and excessive beach balling is the noted behaviour
 
  • Like
Reactions: east85

east85

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 24, 2010
1,343
495
Not all models are currently supported and excessive beach balling is the noted behaviour

I'm curious, is there any official list of supported third party SSDs? Or a list of ones that exhibit problems?
 

Gav2k

macrumors G3
Jul 24, 2009
9,216
1,608
To be honest it's bits from around the web and it's crucial and Samsung that are mainly effected but not all models. Intel seems to be the least problematic
 
  • Like
Reactions: east85

davidlv

macrumors 68020
Apr 5, 2009
2,291
874
Kyoto, Japan
To be honest it's bits from around the web and it's crucial and Samsung that are mainly effected but not all models. Intel seems to be the least problematic
Just to add one more data point: Plextor M5P in a cMP SATA 2 sled works with the terminal Trimforce command, so does a Plextor M5S in a late 2011 MBP (SATA 3), both running the OSX 10.10.5 2nd public beta.
 

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,710
7,280
To be honest it's bits from around the web and it's crucial and Samsung that are mainly effected but not all models. Intel seems to be the least problematic
Multiple Samsungs work fine for me. There was that Linux bug regarding Samsung trim that got everyone nervous but I haven't seen any legitimate, verified reports that Samsungs go slower when trim is enabled.
 

Sean869

macrumors member
Nov 7, 2012
64
3
Dorset, United Kingdom
I enabled Trim via Terminal on 10.10.4 and experienced excessive beachballing on my Crucial M4 SSD. My MacBook model is in my signature. This was pretty odd. Anyways, I eventually disabled native Trim via Terminal and re-installed the third party TrimEnabler application. I had disabled TrimEnabler and uninstalled prior to enabling Trim natively with Terminal, so everything should have been "clean" so to speak.

For whatever reason TrimEnabler works fine and I get no beachballing, while Terminal Trim that has been natively put into 10.10.4 has been a nightmare.

I'm just wondering if anyone might have any ideas as to why this is, or if anyone has had a similar experience.
Have you updated the firmware. There is a new version for Crucial drives. I updated my MX100 256gb and then enabled trim with no problems.
 

east85

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 24, 2010
1,343
495
The new version of the firmware is MU02 and one of the fixes is problems with Trim

Thank you for the heads-up. Unfortunately the latest revision of firmware for my Crucial M4 2.5" drive was released in 2013 and has not been updated since (070H). So I am current on firmware. Glad to hear you found a way to make this work. For the time being, running TrimEnabler isn't much of a bother. Maybe El Capitan will be better, just have to wait and see, or wait for firmware.
 

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,248
13,324
If it was me, and
If it was a matter of TRIM enabled with beachballs, or
TRIM DISabled with no beachballs,

I'd just DISable TRIM and go with "what works"...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.