Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jamescwarren

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 10, 2005
403
0
Isle of Man
I am really sick with not being able to open .exe files on a mac. I've seen all these emulators for example: VirtualPC, Guest PC and Qemu X but you have to pay for something with them. You have to buy Virtual PC and Guest PC, and for Qemu X you've got to buy the actual Windows os. I have tried file juicer but that didn't work for me. All I want is a program for Mac that lets you convert a .exe file to anything like: .dmg or .sit or .bin etc... Surely there must be one major hacker out there? If you have any replies just email me at: jamescwarren@googlemail.com.

Thanks
 

mad jew

Moderator emeritus
Apr 3, 2004
32,191
9
Adelaide, Australia
Oh dear.

What apps are you trying to run. Emulating them is slow and expensive (as you've worked out) so the best option is to get Mac equivalents. If you list them here, we may be able to offer alternatives assuming they don't already have Mac versions. :)
 

.:*Robot Boy*:.

macrumors 6502
Jan 21, 2005
373
0
New Zealand
Are you trying to run the .exe file, or simply compress it? I would've thought Disk Utility could create a disk image (.dmg) containing an .exe file.

If you're looking to run that .exe file on a Mac without a Windows emulator, you're out of luck :(
 

jamescwarren

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 10, 2005
403
0
Isle of Man
Basically I would just like to run simple apps. For example: Microsoft Messenger 7.5. I have got Mercury Messenger and it has loads of features but on my computer it is really slow. And other things aswell like sharware and stuff.
 

Chundles

macrumors G5
Jul 4, 2005
12,037
493
jamescwarren said:
Basically I would just like to run simple apps. For example: Microsoft Messenger 7.5. I have got Mercury Messenger and it has loads of features but on my computer it is really slow. And other things aswell like sharware and stuff.

Messenger 7.5 is Windows only. It won't run on the Mac. The best we have is Messenger 5 and it sucks balls.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,941
162
rosalindavenue said:
And more generally, all ".exe" files are windows only and will not run on a mac.
Nearly all...

If they are self-extracting files, there are some apps that will decompress these without the need for Windows.
 

SmurfBoxMasta

macrumors 65816
Nov 24, 2005
1,351
0
I'm only really here at night.
Sun Baked said:
Nearly all...

If they are self-extracting files, there are some apps that will decompress these without the need for Windows.

actually, they are executable files.....the same kind as those nastly worms/trogans/viruses that infect windblows systems :(

decompressing and opening/running an .exe file are 2 different actions btw :)
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,941
162
SmurfBoxMasta said:
actually, they are executable files.....the same kind as those nastly worms/trogans/viruses that infect windblows systems :(

decompressing and opening/running an .exe file are 2 different actions btw :)
But it's what he wants to do, either some of the zips of flash files he gets he wants to play with and file juicer ain't cutting it.

Of course Stuffit should work if they are some of the common PC archives.
 

BlueRevolution

macrumors 603
Jul 26, 2004
6,054
4
Montreal, QC
definitely find Mac equivalents of any Windows software you can't track down. if you absolutely can't, I believe there's a few open source x86 emulators you might want to try that would be free. I'm not sure what the names are, so if anyone else knows what I'm talking about I'd appreciate it.

you'd still have to buy whatever version of Windows you want to emulate, and at least 1 GB of RAM is helpful.
 

Dane D.

macrumors 6502a
Apr 16, 2004
645
9
ohio
Why?

Dah they're Windows only execute files. Just find a Mac app that does the same thing. Avoid MS software all together. MS stuff is for Windows world of computing. :D
 

PlaceofDis

macrumors Core
Jan 6, 2004
19,241
6
Dane D. said:
Dah they're Windows only execute files. Just find a Mac app that does the same thing. Avoid MS software all together. MS stuff is for Windows world of computing. :D

why avoid MicroSoft software? they make mac products. and Office is quite good at what it does imo. OpenOffice is just not there yet...

internet explorer should be stayed away from, and perhaps WMP, but WMP does work fine too in most cases.
 

Dane D.

macrumors 6502a
Apr 16, 2004
645
9
ohio
Personnal Pref

why avoid MicroSoft software? they make mac products. and Office is quite good at what it does imo. OpenOffice is just not there yet...

I avoid all things MS, it's a personnal thing with me. I loathe MS, they are like the General Motors Corp. of computer software. They're big, they're not innovative, they produce less then desirable products and people still buy their junk. I am of the opinion that biggest is not best. I've used Mac IE and Outlook Express in the past but found other apps that were more to my liking. As for Office, I don't own it, I have no need for it. Being in the graphics arts field, anything MS (Word, Excel) that is sent to us we convert to text and insert into whatever app is called for to produce the end file. If I need to produce something I open an graphic program, AppleWorks, even SimpleText.
 

Mr. Anderson

Moderator emeritus
Nov 1, 2001
22,568
7
VA
Although it would be nice to avoid all things MS - its still used by the majority of individuals on computers - Mac or PC. So you have to be able to share files (Office, etc.) and condemning something purely because its MS doesn't get you very far.

Given the recent news that MS is stopping support of IE for the Mac just makes it easier to be frustrated with them - but they're more like the annoying relative - no matter what you do you can't get rid of them and they'll always be part of your family.....

D
 

bousozoku

Moderator emeritus
Jun 25, 2002
16,120
2,399
Lard
mad jew said:
Aren't there .EXE files associated with folding? Irrespective, it's not really relevant to jamescwarren. :eek:

Barely, and that's just because they're using the same makefile to build all versions of executables. Have you ever tried to run them directly from the shell?

In any case, equivalent software is always a much better thing that trying to force feed the operating system something it doesn't want. Diesel in your gasoline engine? No problem. It might run funny, as long as it runs. :p
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.