Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

toolbox84

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 10, 2017
8
0
Hi,

I am using Mid. 2010 Mac Pro (The towers), with these configurations:

Processor: 2x2.4 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Total Number of Cores: 8
Memory: 18 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
OS: 10.12.5

I am using this computer mainly for creative work. The software I use is Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Corel Painter.

Recently I found out that I could use an external Graphics Card for better performance. I would like to get expert information on this.

What do you recommend for my configuration? Which external card is good?

Thank you
 

Prince134

macrumors 6502
Aug 17, 2010
338
153
Hi,

I am using Mid. 2010 Mac Pro (The towers), with these configurations:

Processor: 2x2.4 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Total Number of Cores: 8
Memory: 18 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
OS: 10.12.5

I am using this computer mainly for creative work. The software I use is Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Corel Painter.

Recently I found out that I could use an external Graphics Card for better performance. I would like to get expert information on this.

What do you recommend for my configuration? Which external card is good?

Thank you

The best card for your job is Nvidia GTX1080 Ti.
 

toolbox84

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 10, 2017
8
0
The best card for your job is Nvidia GTX1080 Ti.

Thank you for the suggestion. I want something that will go for about 7 years. Also, I am planning to do 3D work in the near future. Is your suggestion still good for 3D and 7 years?

Thanks.
 

Prince134

macrumors 6502
Aug 17, 2010
338
153
Thank you for the suggestion. I want something that will go for about 7 years. Also, I am planning to do 3D work in the near future. Is your suggestion still good for 3D and 7 years?

Thanks.
I don't have an answer for this one.
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
Hi,

I am using Mid. 2010 Mac Pro (The towers), with these configurations:

Processor: 2x2.4 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Total Number of Cores: 8
Memory: 18 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5770 1024 MB
OS: 10.12.5

I am using this computer mainly for creative work. The software I use is Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Corel Painter.

Recently I found out that I could use an external Graphics Card for better performance. I would like to get expert information on this.

What do you recommend for my configuration? Which external card is good?

Thank you
The cMP (Mac Pro towers) don't need external graphics cards - you can put graphics cards inside the tower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pat500000

toolbox84

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 10, 2017
8
0
The cMP (Mac Pro towers) don't need external graphics cards - you can put graphics cards inside the tower.
I was thinking external just incase I want to use it for MacBook Pro too. But I guess that is not the main goal.
 

Flint Ironstag

macrumors 65816
Dec 1, 2013
1,334
744
Houston, TX USA
Your safest bet right now is a 1080 Founder's Edition. Both the 1080Ti and Titan Xp have been reported to cause sudden shutdowns. Check the blog at macvidcards.

All that said, I have no idea whether or not your particular functions are GPU accelerated. Might want to check with your software vendors before taking the plunge.
 

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
I was thinking external just incase I want to use it for MacBook Pro too. But I guess that is not the main goal.

This is not possible - the cMP does not have Thunderbolt and there is no way to add it.

You can route PCIe external, but this will look weird and is complicated, i did it at one point.

You mainly want to trash that 5770 or if you have slots 2,3,4 unused get a second much better one - RX4xx and RX5xx cards from AMD are very fast and use only 1 6-8pin connector; with some minor case bending they also fit in slot 4 and cover the HDD bays 3 and 4, allowing the use of all 4 PCIe slots - as the RX cards (reference design) have only the lower row as ports all 4 stay usable. See here in my secondary Mac.
 
Last edited:

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
Define GPGPU? I was running displays on 3 cards external (each at x1) and 1 internal (x16) at the same time - OSX does this without issues. With 4 GPUs on slot 3/4 behind another PLX splitter the entire Mac refused to POST though, slot 1/2 do not have this problem.

Expresscard works, sure, but you waste 3 precious PCIe lanes with it. Interesting concept though, need to see if can get 4 adapters into 1 slot on a PCB and wire them to a PLX splitter, but currently testing SAS to transport 4 lanes (one SAS cable supports up to 4 PCIe lanes as the pin count is nearly the same as 1 PCIe lane per port).
 

Synchro3

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2014
1,987
850
Define GPGPU? I was running displays on 3 cards external (each at x1) and 1 internal (x16) at the same time - OSX does this without issues. With 4 GPUs on slot 3/4 behind another PLX splitter the entire Mac refused to POST though, slot 1/2 do not have this problem.

Expresscard works, sure, but you waste 3 precious PCIe lanes with it. Interesting concept though, need to see if can get 4 adapters into 1 slot on a PCB and wire them to a PLX splitter, but currently testing SAS to transport 4 lanes (one SAS cable supports up to 4 PCIe lanes as the pin count is nearly the same as 1 PCIe lane per port).

The eGPU via Expresscard was just a gimmick, an experiment. :) The Express Card 34 adapter costed me only $15. OpenGL was a lot worse than with the internal card, but OpenCL was benefiting. Never tried a display with that configuration because only 193-199 MiB/s seemed to me a bit too slow:
CUDA-Z - eGPU GTX 570.png

Yes, it is a waste of 3 PCIe lanes, therefore I would recommend a PCI-E-16x extender cable or the Amfeltec solution if you need an external GPU.
 
Last edited:

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
Did this sync at 2.5GT/s / PCIe 1.1? 200MB/s would be consistent with 1 lane 1.1 (2.5Gbit ~).

Interesting, might have been cable quality of the eGPU kit - the PLX on 3/4 is sensitive to such things (aside that most cards only run at 1.1 in a cMP, which internal is not THAT bad but matters a lot if you only have 1 lane in use).
 

Synchro3

macrumors 68000
Jan 12, 2014
1,987
850
2.5GB/s 1 lane PCI-E 1.0 is correct. The limiting factor was the Express Card 34 adapter, it has a maximum throughput of 2.5 Gbit/s through PCI Express: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExpressCard

The same eGPU (PE4L) via a Sonnet Echo Express Card Pro (Thunderbolt) adapter indicated 5.0 Gb/s. The cable was no problem.
 
Last edited:

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
That is weird - same as mini PCIe expresscard was designed for 1.1 but can run 2.0/3.0 fine if the adapter is passive, probably contains some electronic hm.
 

orph

macrumors 68000
Dec 12, 2005
1,884
393
UK
it needs to be mentioned that most the software you use will not benefit from a GPU upgrade in a big way
"Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Corel Painter"are mostly CPU/RAM/drive speed limited so maybe buy SSD instead?

GTX1080 Ti may be huge over kill if you relay want a GPU upgrade an RX 460 or 1050/1060 may be better options but you will need to look in to it a bit to check there's no problems the ATI cards may be better options but i think you may need to upgrade to the newest os for them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ActionableMango

ActionableMango

macrumors G3
Sep 21, 2010
9,613
6,909
I am using this computer mainly for creative work. The software I use is Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, Dreamweaver and Corel Painter.

IMHO for these applications you would be significantly better off with a CPU upgrade and, if you are still using a hard drives, an SSD or two. Also memory might help a lot, depending on your usage--check your memory pressure during heavy use.

As some others have mentioned, external GPU isn't really suited for the 2010 Mac Pro because it doesn't have Thunderbolt. So you can't really just swap a GPU box between your Mac Pro and MacBook Pro, if that was your intent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orph

MH01

Suspended
Feb 11, 2008
12,107
9,297
I was thinking external just incase I want to use it for MacBook Pro too. But I guess that is not the main goal.

Sonnet and razer enclosures are plug are plug and play. Highly recommended , I've used both.

As for the card, heck a 1070 will be a massive upgrade for you to be honest. I'd almost say get a cheap 1070 and in a few years upgrade to the 1070 replacement which in that time will make the 1080ti look slow

1080ti, fantastic card, though still expansive, great for gamers, and given your system specs, I'd invest the saved money into more ram and ssd or even CPU
 

MH01

Suspended
Feb 11, 2008
12,107
9,297
Sure. If you have TB. Which a 2010 Pro does not.

With something like the core, it's plug and play. I'd honesty put the card into the MP and when I wanted to use i on the MacBook Pro, take it out and into the core. It would take minutes.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.