Just get a Samsung Evo 850. Doesn't matter SATA 2 or 3 interface. Boot speeds don't climb just because the interface or disk has a higher maximum bandwidth.
The OP is asking about booting into Bootcamp, not boot speeds. SSDs installed on PCIe cards in Mac Pros can be much faster than SATA SSDs in Mac Pros. Some of the cards will allow the computer to boot into Windows, but many will not.I think it's been proved many times that for normal booting, almost any SSD are the same. The bottleneck seems not at there.
The OP is asking about booting into Bootcamp, not boot speeds. SSDs installed on PCIe cards in Mac Pros can be much faster than SATA SSDs in Mac Pros. Some of the cards will allow the computer to boot into Windows, but many will not.
After a critical slowdown, I avoid TLC now.Just get a Samsung Evo 850. Doesn't matter SATA 2 or 3 interface. Boot speeds don't climb just because the interface or disk has a higher maximum bandwidth.
- What would be the fastest SSD I can use for booting to Windows, which is equal or larger than 512GB?
- Which M2 card would work well?
I don't mean the booting speed. I mean running Windows.
I have Evo 850 on C: right now. I get a steady 180 MB and since I'm running a lot of VMs that's a bottleneck for me.
Slash, tx a lot!Fastest by far is the Samsung XP941 and SM951 AHCI. Only AHCI M.2 cards are bootable in 2009/2010 Mac Pro.
Slash, tx a lot!
By the way, SM951 AHCI seems pretty hard to get in Germany. I could only find the https://www.amazon.de/Samsung-SM951-128GB-Solid-Drives/dp/B00VELD5D8 which is 128gb.
Everything available is nvme. I'm assuming nvme, does not work for Windows for boot drive on MP 2010, correct?
MP5,1 southbridge SATA interface is SATA II. That's the four internal bays plus the two ODD ones.I am getting very slow speeds in windows on my MPc 2010 using various SATA SSD disks. I have the Samsung EVO and Kingston A400. They both give med speeds just below 200Mb/sec using the AJA benchmarking program. One of them is tested in windows 7 ultimate, the other one in windows 10 fresh install.
Is there some kind of limit to the SATA that stops the disks from giving more then this?
I would assme these kind of disks should reach around 500Mb/s as they do when i google this.
What is wrong here? Does this have anything to do with BIOS emulation / ATA emulation? Bootcamp not running EFI mode, and not getting correct speeds? This is running from its own Windows partition. Not virtual. It boots straight into windows, and was installed using bootcamp installation method.
Thanks for any advice!
//GF
To use a NVMe blade with Windows 8.1 or 10 is needed a UEFI install and it's not supported or recommended with MP5 said:Are you sure that it is not possible to make install on normal SSD first, and then clone the boot partition to the NVME?
I have been trying this but cannot find any free apps that will clone the small 200mb partition that is in front of the NTFS partition.
My impression was that the problem is due to bootcamp refusal to install on external disk. However by first install on internal disk and then clone content would be a possible way around it.
However, i still struggle.
//gf
BootCamp is a CSM/legacy Windows install and won't boot from a NVMe blade at all. Windows 8.1 and 10 only can boot from NVMe if you installed via UEFI mode. Cloning a CSM install to a NVMe blade won't work.
BootCamp is a CSM/legacy Windows install and won't boot from a NVMe blade at all. Windows 8.1 and 10 only can boot from NVMe if you installed via UEFI mode. Cloning a CSM install to a NVMe blade won't work.
Use a SATA SSD for Windows, installed via CSM/legacy mode, and prevent future headaches.
Thats so sad! I really want the higher speed from my new blade.
Is the installation process that harms the EFi on the Mac?
Would it be possible to clone existing efi install to avoid danger of corrupting the EFI?
Thanks for all the good advice!
//GF
I think it's been proved many times that for normal booting, almost any SSD are the same. The bottleneck seems not at there.
View attachment 681171