Seriously, you guys spent so much money for M2 Mac Pro, only not even full half year yet then Apple ships M3. Doesn’t make too much sense for me since you guys suppose to be the VIP that you have bought their most expensive product.
Oh, isn't it? I haven't check the benchmarks results. I though the M3 Max will be "very close" to the M2 Ultra, But I don't know the M3 Max actually faster than the M2 Ultra in multi core benchmarks.Despite having fewer cores, with 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores, the M3 Max has surpassed the multi-core performance of the M2 Ultra chip. Early scores from Geekbench 6 show the M3 Max reaching over 21,000, a leap ahead of the M2 Ultra's score of around 20,000.
Doesn’t make any sense for me that someone can just buy a M3 Max laptop now with much cheaper price that is faster than M2 Ultra Mac Pro that was released 5 months ago.
Oh, isn't it? I haven't check the benchmarks results. I though the M3 Max will be "very close" to the M2 Ultra, But I don't know the M3 Max actually faster than the M2 Ultra in multi core benchmarks.
Do you know if that's cherry picking result. Or if that's generally correct?
If it's the case, then it's function.
10 years ago, the Mac Pro 2013 was destroyed by the Macbook only in H264 encoding performance (due to lack of Intel QuickSync and Apple insist not to provide any support the utilise the D700's AMD VCE).
But now, Mac Pro 2023 is destroyed by a Macbook in all area 😂
Definitely not for me. That's why I am still using the 5,1.I really admire those of you, where the difference of CPU/GPU speed makes a significant difference in your day-to-day professional work flow. If you are in this bracket, kudos to you. Because I am absolutely NOT.
I really admire those of you, where the difference of CPU/GPU speed makes a significant difference in your day-to-day professional work flow. If you are in this bracket, kudos to you. Because I am absolutely NOT.
For me, CPU & GPU speed very seldom has any impact on my business. For me, its about to be out there on customers, networking the hell out of it, standing on that exhibition floor or sitting in on technical seminars and luncheons to get customers interested in my service and exchanging contacts for future projects to follow up on. I wish I could tell you, - "Yap, the processor speed of those chips moves the world for me." - It just doesn't, sorry. It really shows, how unprofessional and old school I must be.
For me its still how to get into the customers faces and a subsequent service product. Processing CPU speed is just NOT my main concern and makes next to no difference. My humble respect as an alien creature that looks clueless on the discussion between ants, raging about the speed difference between M2 and M3 as it would be the most serious concern and mission critical. I just figured, I must be an ancient alien that's somehow survived mysteriously and should not exist in the first place. I wonder how I did survive with my MacBook Pro 17 from 2010.... Humble Alien greetings from Alpha Century from an ancient, long forgotten universe, where somehow the human contact still is NO.1
Now back to the main topic: M3 is really a tad faster. Damn... who would have though...
Seriously, you guys spent so much money for M2 Mac Pro, only not even full half year yet then Apple ships M3. Doesn’t make too much sense for me since you guys suppose to be the VIP that you have bought their most expensive product.
I think this is expected since day 1. And that's why people complain a non upgradable Apple Silicon Mac Pro doesn't make any sense. Especially with that Mac Pro price tag.
The question about cpu/gpu cores doesn’t begin to address the elephant in the room which is that apple ****ed over all their customers who bought the m2 pro MacBook by releasing an upgraded model in the same year.
There will always be something better around the corner, and the current up-to-date stuff is likely just fine
And is your machine suddenly obsolete and can't do what you bought it for just because a new computer dropped? Highly highly unlikely. Maybe if you're that worried, you should reconsider why you're spending $10K on a computer.You mean you pay like 10000 USD for a computer then 5 months later a much cheaper notebook is faster than it with newer model is “just fine”? 5 months, not 5 years.
And is your machine suddenly obsolete and can't do what you bought it for just because a new computer dropped? Highly highly unlikely
How dare Apple keep working on their products after I bought one! Stop this nonsense at once!
So is this a case where you actually need the fastest Mac available, or is this more just for personal satisfaction.99% spent so much money for Mac Pro mainly because it was the fastest Mac, and 99% of these buyers would not buy for sure if you told them 5 months later what they bought becomes a old generation, even Non Ultra is faster than it.
99% spent so much money for Mac Pro mainly because it was the fastest Mac, and 99% of these buyers would not buy for sure if you told them 5 months later what they bought becomes a old generation, even Non Ultra is faster than it.
Are there any AS Mac Pro users on this forum?
Awfully tough to put PCIe cards inside of a MacBook.